Posted on 11/29/2004 1:45:56 PM PST by neverdem
|
|
www.washingtontimes.com
Airport screeners find 75 guns per monthBy Audrey HudsonTHE WASHINGTON TIMES Published November 25, 2004 Traveling for the holidays? Have everything you need? Razor? Toothbrush? Handgun? Ammunition?
|
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Do you really suppose there is such a shortage of stupidity and ignorance in the world that it is really necessary for you to come here and spread yours around?
While a middle Eastern looking man with a bulge around his chest, shouting 'Allah Akbar', was waved right through.
No, that was a tactical situation
Guns favor the few and organized over the many and unorganized. Melees without ranged weapons favor sheer numbers.
Considering how many of us "out here" are former military or retired/off duty law enforcement, your "out of my butt" stats are pessimistic enough to be utterly irrelavent.
Please read S.L.A. Marshall's Men Against Fire and rebut the facts contained therein.
So, the terrorists pull their guns...and the fight's over.
You ever see LEO marksmanship?
Not even that much. Back when cops carried six-guns, that may have been so--but in an era of high-cap autos, they've gone to "spray and pray."
Yes, the 737 "convertible."
Yep. We all may as well just friggin' surrender right now.
Self defense shootings are not the same as war. Come back with statistics about how law abiding people that chose to carry guns would react and the numbers will be rather different. Having the 'good guys' freeze up at first is not a problem. That just means either the some other passenger solved the issue before they became un froze and complicated it or else they become on frozen after the terrorist have fully announced themselves and picking targets will be easy. What is better? a hand full of dead terrorists and a couple wounded bystanders or September 11?
LEO's don't get as much practice as the average citizen carrier.
Pretty good if they use frangible ammo.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/frangible.htm
Frangible Ammunition
Frangible, or soft, rounds are designed to break apart when they hit walls or other hard surfaces to prevent ricochets during close-quarters combat. Frangible ammunition represents the first viable revolutionary change to firearms science in the past 100 years.
Frangible ammunition is a relatively recent development in bullets, presenting a departure from the standard projectiles in use for both range shooting and personal protection.
With the advent of modern hostage rescue tactics in the 1970s and 1980s, the military and police agencies began to look for ways to minimize overpenetration risks. One widely-accepted solution was the frangible round, also known as the AET (Advanced Energy Transfer) round.
Frangible rounds are available in a wide array of pistol calibers, but due to the inherently high velocities of rifle rounds, frangible ammunition is much less effective in rifles.
It is only produced in 5.56mm NATO and 7.62mm NATO, and its performance in actual combat is dubious. There are two frangible rounds that have been approved for training purposes only.
One is a 9mm, and the other a 5.56. Approval for operational use will depend on the special mission requirements (the military necessity) for the round.
Frangible bullets are not made from a lead projectile covered with a copper jacket, but are composites of hybrid materials either pressed together at high pressure or glued together with adhesives.
Frangible bullets are designed to break up into smaller pieces upon contact with harder objects or surfaces. The polymer-compound round produces no splashback and vastly decreased ricochets.
I sent the LA Airport Police an E-mail asking them to return it or compensate me under the 5th Amendment, but they never answered.
I never followed up because they can fine "troublemakers" $10,000 for what I did.
I have heard (but don't know for sure) that rather then confiscating "contraband", some places now let you mail it home for a fee.
I won't fly commercial any more except to funerals more than three days drive away.
Yes, we must make sure we absolutely destroy the people who didn't even know they had a gun in the first place.
Urban myth.
Passing on an urban myth as fact is always a bad idea, regardless of who is tellin it or to whom.
I was at an indoor pistol range in a major city some years back. I had shot in the public range, which was neat, orderly, and well kept. Because of an overflow on that particular day, I was allowed to shoot back in the range usually reserved for LEOs. From the torn sound insulation on the walls, to the marks on the ceiling, I had the impression that they were hitting anything but the target down range. Scary.
No doubt, a bag you had bought at a garage sale lo those many years ago.
Actually, they are, but you'd rather not admit it...
Come back with statistics about how law abiding people that chose to carry guns would react and the numbers will be rather different.
Again, they won't. As you've pointed out, once the first gun's out, the fight is OVER...and the bad guys will be the ones drawing first.
Having the 'good guys' freeze up at first is not a problem.
How do you know? Have you ever outdrawn a man who's already pulled out a gun?
That just means either the some other passenger solved the issue before they became un froze and complicated it or else they become on frozen after the terrorist have fully announced themselves and picking targets will be easy.
I'd love to see all these macho-he-men show me, with a live-fire exercise, how they'd outdraw a guy who's already got his gun out and ready.
What is better? a hand full of dead terrorists and a couple wounded bystanders or September 11?
A far more likely result: a handful of dead terrorists, a bunch of dead passengers, including friendlies, macho-he-men puffing up to sing their victory song...
And the second wave of terrorists caps the macho-he-men, gain control of the aircraft, and we still have 9/11.
Unarmed melees favor the many over the few. Gunfights favor the organized over the unorganized. I'd prefer the former instead of the latter. Leave the guns in the cockpit as final protective fires.
Neither gets much practice dealing with adrenaline.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.