To: kattracks
Seems a far too reasonable and modest proposal.
We are probably at the worst of it; funding terrorism by way of U.N. donations just to keep the corrupt 'friends of the U.N.' alive, while they serve their own corrupt interests.
Better for us to STOP the funding; pull the real estate in NYC. . .give these people thirty days to evacuate the premises and and the US as well.
Doubt that this corruption is such a surprise. . .but the Iraq invasion brings the 'discovery phase' of this debacle to the attetetion of the world-at-large.
8 posted on
11/29/2004 12:45:40 AM PST by
cricket
(I)
To: cricket
i say we gun'em down.............metaphorically of course
11 posted on
11/29/2004 12:48:28 AM PST by
wildcatf4f3
(out of the sun)
To: cricket
Reasonable is in the eye of the beholder... to my eyes, reasonable is pulling out of the UN, demolishing the HQ, and arresting everyone remotely connected to either Oil-for-Food or terror.
27 posted on
11/29/2004 3:31:06 AM PST by
thoughtomator
(The Era of Old Media is over! Long live the Pajamasphere!)
To: cricket
Better for us to STOP the funding; pull the real estate in NYCAn article in the New York Sun last week indicated that NY City legislators are considering the denial of a UN lease extension.
32 posted on
11/29/2004 4:52:21 AM PST by
angkor
To: cricket
"Better for us to STOP the funding; pull the real estate in NYC. . .give these people thirty days to evacuate the premises and and the US as well."From your lips to God's ears.
48 posted on
11/29/2004 9:57:08 AM PST by
semaj
("....by their fruit you will know them.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson