Recall just after 911 when all the dems/libs and LBs were all screaming because jetpilotz(a)somehost.com and other email addresses used by the Islamic skyjacker terrorists were not caught by the FBI and CIA?
Either way it's Bush's fault they say......
Just like the "homeless" propaganda I heard on WABC 770am NYC alleging to be "news" about how the "homeless" problem Slick Willie fixed is back and worse than before the Dark Ages in Europe.
I guess it's Bush's fault as they say......
I recall back a bit when a lib asked if I was carrying one of my Colts as I went with her on a side errand to a bank before heading to a museum; just why is it that libs all are against certain things until it involves their personal safety and money and then they expect someone else to carry the burden for them?
Che Guevara was nailed by trapping his satellite call to his mother; OBL was another mother we tracked with technology (Predator/Hellfire), only to have the Clinton Administration fail to make the sale.
But in the larger sense, is there a proven CIA presence here, or more dark hints?
150K? William Byrd spent that every day on a post office with his name on it.
The CIA? Really? Gee, violated their charter? When it is the FBI tasked with the domestic counterterrorist threat?
What would Colleen Rowley say?
Yet the prevailing chorus is to ram through the extant intelligence "reform" which emerged from the Olympian 911 Commission giving the DCI command of all satellites--
OBL and his crew are reduced to using human messengers because they fear electronic monitoring--
Just as the robust law enforcement presence on the net caught Scott Ritter making a date with two minor girls, so it can intercept and prevent darker deeds.
As long as they aren't after misspellers, FR has nothing to fear.
Thanks for the ping!