Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patriciaruth

long and poor taste, but here's one:



Dear Sir or Ma'am:

I have learned a great deal from you and understand why you would propose and support a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18.22 clearly states it to be an
abomination to God.

However, I do need some advice from you regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how best to follow them.

1. Leviticus 25.44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans but not to Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21.7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of uncleanness (Leviticus15.19-24). The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord. (Leviticus 1.9) The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35.2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?

6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination (Leviticus11.10), it is a lesser abomination than others. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there degrees of abomination?

7. Leviticus.21.20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?

8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Leviticus19.27. How should they die?

9. I know from Leviticus 11.6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean. May I still play football if I wear gloves?

10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Leviticus 19.19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/poly blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? (Leviticus 24.10-16) Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, as we do with people who are caught breaking other laws? (Leviticus 20.14)

I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.

Yours truly,
An Inquiring Supporter

P.S. I look forward to your answers because there are a number of other issues that I'd like to get settled as soon as you've enlightened me on these ... Thanks again.


30 posted on 11/28/2004 5:11:07 PM PST by JockoManning
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JockoManning

Answer to Number 4.

"Smite them if they can't take a yoke."


106 posted on 11/28/2004 5:43:03 PM PST by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: JockoManning

"long and poor taste, but here's one"

Right you are. It is in EXTREMELY poor taste. Plus, it shows that whoever conceived it has zero knowledge about Levitical law and why the some parts still apply and others don't.


142 posted on 11/28/2004 6:08:08 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: JockoManning
I guess this is from a liberal, tongue-in-cheek, jab at all of us in "Jesusland". The Church claims authority to interpret Scripture authentically so that those who are hear the call will be able to confidently respond faithfully. The Church has a new covenant with Jesus Christ and that covenant supersedes most of what you wrote from Leviticus. The prohibition on homosexual activity however is still very clear in the New Testament and thus unlike the other laws from Leviticus (Old testament), this one remains.

A better question for you to ask is why are heterosexuals allowed to divorce and remarry; that too is condemned in NT.
My only answer is that divorce and remarriage is adultery but that just because a person has acquiesced and accepted as "normal" one moral failing, it in no ways obliges him to accept another. "Hypocrisy is the tribute that Vice pays to virtue". Hypocrisy is wrong, but promoting homosexuality as normal is worse.
342 posted on 12/03/2004 4:09:21 PM PST by Piers-the-Ploughman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson