[FITZ]

Sorry but you never adequately explained how 3 judges could fall on the pro-life side and Gonzalez on the pro-abortion side --- you never exactly accused the 3 of being lunatics or against the law. Gonzalez made his decision and it was for the abortion of minors without the consent or even knowledge of their parents.

It's even still the law that parents must consent to an ear-piercing --- how Gonzalez and the 5 others believed they must be given abortions without parents' knowledge is beyond me. They took a very broad interpretation of the word "abuse" to mean that even parents becoming angry or opposing the abortion would count as abuse.

[Luis Gonzalez]

The faulty level of adequacy here is in your inability to understand plain English.

You want judges to find in accordance to ideology rather than in accordance to the law, unless of course you don't agree with their ideology, in which case you want them to find in accordance to the law.

The law in YOUR State requires parental consent for ear piercing and not for abortions, for abrotion it only requires parental notification, and allows for a judicial bypass to be granted...YOUR State legislators crafted crappy laws.

YOUR State does not require parental consent for abortion, only notification, YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW THE LAW IN IN YOUR OWN STATE, BUT YOU WANT TO ARGUE ABOUT THE WAY THAT GONZALES JUDGED ON A LAW YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT!