My problem is a fellow who picks nits with others' statements, yet who expects those same others to accept his own technically erroneous statements without criticism.
If you see anyone like that, you let 'em know, okay?
So I was kind to say "not completely". Your statement above (post 7) is beyond "nit-picking", it confounds mass and weight, and g (acceleration at Earth surface) and G (gravitational constant), and it does not address BookaT's proposition.
Get a mirror.