This article is a classic lesson in why reading the N.Y. Slimes is virtually an act of mental masturbation. One man murders 6 others. The Slimes then publishes an article about the hurt feelings of an ethnic group without one single verifiable insult to the ethnic group and glosses over the murder of 6 people.
Wonder what culture is represented by shooting people in the back?
Absolutely! This article is a pathetic attempt to shift the blame from the perp to the Evil American culture.
Didn't I read that this poor, misunderstood murderer actually walked up to one of his still living victims, said "Oh, you're not dead yet", and fired again?
I tend to think that the "ethnic slur" accusation is just something trotted out by the perp to make it seem somehow excusable that he shot several people, some in the back, in an act of premeditated murder.
The ethnic slur allegation is nothing but a cheap excuse. I'm sure none of them could've seen what ethnicity he was, nor, I'm sure, would they have cared.
If one white had shot 6 hmong...the Times would have gone on and on and on about white racism! Demanding a federal investigation etc.
Just more NYT propoganda. Just like animal farm:
Immigrants good. White americans bad.
Four legs. Two legs bad
That was my first thought on reading it.
Lack of responsibility......
I'm barfing at the posts about how this man was so misunderstood.
If we can't "understand" these people, then LOCK the borders.
Case closed.