Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Armed Hunters No Match For SKS Assault Rifle
Violence Policy Center ^ | November 22, 2004 | Press Release

Posted on 11/26/2004 9:30:40 PM PST by LibertyRocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: CaptSkip
A Scoped Remington Bolt-Action 700 would have been more effective hunting two or four legged critters.

Meant to include .30 cal or higher.
61 posted on 11/27/2004 2:24:23 AM PST by CaptSkip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

Does it matter to the VPC at all that the hunters, aside from one bolt-action rifle, we unarmed when they were shot?

No. Apparently not. They have as much credibility as Michael Moore.


62 posted on 11/27/2004 2:27:14 AM PST by spodefly (I've posted nothing but BTTT over 1000 times!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

ok so how many police have been killed in the line of duty totall and how many killed with a gun that looks like but isnt an actual assault rifle ? 6 they said in the article hmm that might be .010% of all police deaths


63 posted on 11/27/2004 2:48:54 AM PST by freepatriot32 (http://chonlalonde.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cooltouch

Sir, I resemble that remark about the lousy SKS. Criticize the 7.62 x 39 round, but not the weapon. And remember that Ruger offers its classic Mini-14 in the same caliber as the SKS. In any case, it wasn't the gun, but the human slime clutching it, that caused this atrocity


64 posted on 11/27/2004 3:17:20 AM PST by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

Not to mention he had complete tactical suprise.


65 posted on 11/27/2004 3:49:50 AM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
ignoring...

I don't want to ignore gun grabbers; I want to defeat them soundly once and for all.

Those morons are getting energy and dissipating OUR energy by pulling our chain whenever they like. We can afford to ignore the morons once in a while, and focus our efforts where it counts: getting Supreme Court justices we can live with, for example.

66 posted on 11/27/2004 5:20:14 AM PST by Tax Government (Boycott and defeat the Legacy Media. Become a monthly contributor to FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: oldenuff2no

"I would put money on the fact that every one of the hunters were hunting with a firearm that was more powerful than the 7.62X39 cartridge that the SKS shoots."

No doubt. But to the gun-banners, 'powerful' is how many rounds the gun holds. Just like, 'assualt weapon' is any weapon other than a single shot.


67 posted on 11/27/2004 5:42:56 AM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

Thank God Bush won.


68 posted on 11/27/2004 6:56:19 AM PST by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970
Sir, I resemble that remark about the lousy SKS. Criticize the 7.62 x 39 round, but not the weapon. And remember that Ruger offers its classic Mini-14 in the same caliber as the SKS

Hmmm -- well, if it were a Chinese-made SKS, I'll let my comments stand. I've owned a bunch of the Russian ones and they were quite well made. Anyway, my point was more that it seemed the writer of this hit piece was attempting to demonize an import, as if banning imported "assault weapons" would solve anything. Hence, my pointing out my belief that the AR-15 and Mini-14 are superior. As for the round, I have little criticism for the 7.62x39 round. It has been demonstrated to be extremely effective at its intended use.

69 posted on 11/27/2004 8:36:06 AM PST by Cooltouch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

These people are like termites, they NEVER stop. Their aim is to disarm the American People for whatever nefarious reasons they have. I have often wondered what and who is behind the scenes on this eternal push to reneder us helpless.


70 posted on 11/27/2004 8:39:03 AM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gnarledmaw

The real story is if I understand the facts is that seven of the eight hunters were unarmed.

Is that true??


71 posted on 11/27/2004 8:58:01 AM PST by CHICAGOFARMER (Concealed Carry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: carolinaoutdoorsman

It's not a matter of power my friend. I'll take my little scoped 243 and some camo and one shot will do in any machine gunner, no matter what caliber he has. It's in stealth and accuracy not how big. (It's not how big it is, it's how you use it)LOL


72 posted on 11/27/2004 8:59:23 AM PST by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma

Interesting story. Sounds like some of the victims weren't speaking nicely enough of the shooter to suit him, and since the first victim was the first to draw his weapon, he's going to claim self defense. Might get by with a lesser degree or maybe even an acquittal on that count, but after shooting the ones who were running away he has no defense for the rest.

If most of what Vang says is true, probably none of that would have happened if not for the harsh words of some members of the victims' party. It's no excuse for murder, but it's a good example of why hunters should be (and usually are) courteous to one another. That's the point that needs to be emphasized here - the brand and style of weapons used is irrelevant.


73 posted on 11/27/2004 9:06:57 AM PST by Clinging Bitterly (42)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: bowzer313
This is the heart of the matter. The hunters that were murdered approached this killer's territory with wide-eyed naivete, not realizing or considering that they were entering harm's way. They were easy targets for a determined killer. It wouldn't matter at all what rifle the killer was using if the hunters weren't prepared to take him out as cold-bloodedly as he waxed all of them. This is the problem with the idea of using a firearm for self defense. Having a gun means nothing for self defense if you're not prepared to use it. The hunters that were iced didn't realize what they were up against and didn't have the will to kill that their opponent had.

Jeff Cooper came up with a Color Code to indicate defensive mind-set:

White - Relaxed, unaware, and unprepared.  If attacked in this state the only thing that may save you is the inadequacy and ineptitude of your attacker.  When confronted by something nasty your reaction will probably be, "Oh my God!  This can't be happening to me."

Yellow - Relaxed alert.  No specific threat situation.  Your mindset is that "today could be the day I may have to defend myself."  There is no specific threat but you are aware that the world is an unfriendly place and that you are prepared to do something if necessary.  You use your eyes and ears, and your carriage says "I am alert."   You don't have to be armed in this state but if you are armed you must be in yellow.  When confronted by something nasty your reaction will probably be, "I thought this might happen some day."  You can live in this state indefinitely.

Orange - Specific alert.  Something not quite right has gotten your attention and you shift your primary focus to that thing.  Something is "wrong" with a person or object.  Something may happen.  Your mindset is that "I may have to shoot that person."  Your pistol is usually holstered in this state.  You can maintain this state for several hours.

Red - Fight.  This is your mental trigger.  "If that person does "x" I will shoot them."  Your pistol may, but not necessarily, be in your hand.


The following are some of Jeff's recent comments on the subject (2004-08).

"Considering the principles of personal defense, we have long since come up with the Color Code.  This has met with surprising success in debriefings throughout the world.  The Color Code, as we preach it,  runs white, yellow, orange, and red, and is a means of setting one’s mind into the proper condition when exercising lethal violence, and is not as easy as I had thought at first.  There is a problem in that some  students insist upon confusing the appropriate color with the amount of danger evident in the situation.  As I have long taught, you are not in any color state because of the specific amount of danger you may be in, but rather  in a mental state which enables you to take a difficult psychological step.

"Now, however, the government has gone into this and is handing out color codes nationwide based upon the apparent nature of a peril.  It has always been difficult to teach the Gunsite Color Code, and now it is more so.  We cannot say that the government’s ideas about colors are wrong, but that they are different  from what we have long taught here."The problem is this: your combat mind-set is not dictated by the amount of danger to which you are exposed at the time.  Your combat mind-set is properly dictated by the state of mind you think appropriate to the situation.  You may be in deadly danger at all times, regardless of what the Defense Department tells you.  The color code which influences you does depend upon the willingness you have to jump a psychological barrier against taking irrevocable action.  That decision is less hard to make since the jihadis have already made it."

The hunters, although armed, were walking around in Condition White. They were oblivious to the possible need to defend themselves with deadly force against a human threat
74 posted on 11/27/2004 9:15:16 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (We are going to fight until hell freezes over and then we are going to fight on the ice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CHICAGOFARMER

As far as Ive been able to determine from reports, that is correct.


75 posted on 11/27/2004 11:50:48 AM PST by gnarledmaw (I traded freedom for security and all I got were these damned shackles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
The hunters, although armed, were walking around in Condition White. Only 1 was armed; the others weren't hunting at the time. They came unarmed to rescue a friend who radioed "I've been shot!"... assuming that he was the victim of an accident.

They were oblivious to the possible need to defend themselves with deadly force against a human threat

Never again. From now on I'll hunt with an SKS and friends watching my back, and I suspect many others will do likewise.

76 posted on 11/27/2004 12:20:48 PM PST by Rytwyng (we're here, we're Huguenots, get used to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor; Ladysmith

Ping to self.


77 posted on 11/27/2004 12:22:37 PM PST by Ladysmith (November 2, 2004: Taking America BACK!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: gnarledmaw

The real story is if I understand the facts is that seven of the eight hunters were unarmed.

Is that true??

xxxxxxxxxxxx

As far as Ive been able to determine from reports, that is correct.

by gnarledmaw (

xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Well then this is just a case of cold blooded murder. Plain and simple. That is why charges will be filled on Monday.



78 posted on 11/27/2004 4:38:21 PM PST by CHICAGOFARMER (Concealed Carry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

Comment #79 Removed by Moderator

To: LibertyRocks
So, they are after all the 'assault weapons' that have the characteristics of the 'assault weapons' in the 1994 bill, AND they are after all the 'assault weapons' that DO NOT HAVE the characteristics of the 'assault weapons' in the 1994 bill.

I think this effectively lays to rest the lie that they are not out to ban all guns.

80 posted on 11/27/2004 4:44:36 PM PST by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson