Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Genital Mutilation 'On the Increase in Europe'
WorldNetDaily ^ | 11-27-04 | wnd

Posted on 11/26/2004 6:06:52 PM PST by ChristianDefender

Young girls born in Europe to immigrant families from Africa are being subjected to ritual genital mutilation, and authorities are doing little to discourage it, a leading women’s rights activist warned.

Somalia-born supermodel and best-selling author Waris Dirie, who has campaigned to end the disfiguring practice she suffered at age five in her homeland, said yesterday that she estimates one in every three African families living in Europe is secretly carrying out the ritual on their daughters. No official figures exist.

The procedure – illegal in most European countries – is especially prevalent in Germany and the Netherlands, as well as in Austria, where an estimated 8,000 girls born into immigrant families have been affected, Dirie said.

“We don’t know who’s doing it and where,” because there are few initiatives to prevent it or to encourage doctors, nurses, social workers, teachers and others to report suspected cases, Dirie said. An exception is France, where there is strong awareness and education, she said.

“What good is a law if no one is paying attention?” Dirie told reporters in Austria, where she was being honoured yesterday by a Roman Catholic men’s movement for her efforts to stop the practice.

Islamic religious leaders are telling Europe’s Muslim Africans that the prophets recommend the ancient ritual, which involves the removal of the clitoris, often with a dull blade and no anaesthesia, Dirie said.

“That is a catastrophe,” she said. “Every imam who is not actively against genital mutilation is guilty. Mutilation is not a tradition – it’s a crime that must be abolished.”

Although women generally perform the procedure, sometimes called female circumcision, men are ultimately responsible because “untrimmed” young women “face great difficulties in African societies in finding a husband,” Dirie said.

Between 100 million and 140 million women have undergone genital mutilation worldwide, and two million girls are at risk each year, according to the World Health Organisation, which says the practice can lead to infection, the spread of Aids and crippling physical, psychological and sexual problems.

The practice has been on the rise not only among immigrants in Europe but also in Australia, Canada and the US, Who says.

Petra Bayr, an official with Austria’s Socialist Party, said the bloc’s women would press the government to consider genital mutilation an “act of violence” and legitimate grounds for women fleeing it to be granted asylum in Austria.

“Women who are threatened with genital mutilation or have already suffered it should not have to wait for months for an open door,” added Raimund Loeffelmann, a spokesman for the Catholic men’s organisation honouring Dirie yesterday.


TOPICS: War on Terror
KEYWORDS: circumcised; clitoridectomy; europeanmuslims; genitalmutilation; islam; lipservicenotenuf; muslimwomen; ropma; terror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: billorites

hmmm... your pic is nice but those women's experience is far worst than that... your's maybe called piercing, theirs is called mutilation or "beheading"...


21 posted on 11/26/2004 6:42:39 PM PST by ChristianDefender (Never give the enemy a foothold in your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: chickenlips

"Sorry, but female genital mutilation isn't equivalent to male circumcision. That is unless you think they cut off the entire penis when they circumcise males"

Exactly!


23 posted on 11/26/2004 6:45:14 PM PST by sierrahome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: racnpartsales4u

***They are removing the component responsible for the female orgasm. The cannot satisfy their women.***

...that's why non can convince me to become a muslim because i'm deeply troubled with this things and a lot more...

...how can u please God with such things?... removing a clitoris is like beheading a woman...


24 posted on 11/26/2004 6:46:48 PM PST by ChristianDefender (Never give the enemy a foothold in your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
I would hardly equate male circumcision with "female circumcision" A more true example would be the equivalent of cutting off a mans penis. Hardly the same thing.
25 posted on 11/26/2004 6:52:52 PM PST by CMOTB (. . . _ _ _ . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

Oh Boy... THAT'S ONE OF THE MOST BLASPHEMOUS PIC I'VE EVER SEEN...

... MY GOD IS A MERCIFUL GOD, BUT DONT DO SUCH THING -- YOU DONT KNOW HOW TERRIBLE HE CAN BE ANGRY... i pitty that gal...


26 posted on 11/26/2004 6:53:06 PM PST by ChristianDefender (Never give the enemy a foothold in your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ChristianDefender

Hey, look, I report and you decide. Them is the facts.


27 posted on 11/26/2004 6:56:07 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (From Ku Klux Klan to the modern era of the Koo Kleft Klan...the true RAT legacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Lutonian

Not valueless, but in BIG trouble. Wake up Dude!


29 posted on 11/26/2004 7:04:25 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (From Ku Klux Klan to the modern era of the Koo Kleft Klan...the true RAT legacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ChristianDefender; newzjunkey; Californiajones; chickenlips; sierrahome; CMOTB
newzjunky has a point..sometimes just part of the clitoris is cut off which makes it more like what is done to males.
sometimes much, much more is cut...

the entire practice is disgusting and sad and I found this part ot the article amazing "..... press the government to consider genital mutilation an “act of violence”--- there is a thought.

good article on the vile practice: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/2313097.html
30 posted on 11/26/2004 7:06:46 PM PST by socialismisinsidious ("A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: Fitzcarraldo
Western culture is adopting piercing, toungue and ear mutilation, etc.

Now there's a thought. Make genital mutilation (and/or sterilization) the admission price for all of the above.

AWESOME DUDE!

32 posted on 11/26/2004 7:12:40 PM PST by benjaminjjones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
Here's Oleg Volk, a staunch defender of 2A rights...

Umm...a warning would have been nice. Yuck. Thanks a lot.

33 posted on 11/26/2004 7:12:45 PM PST by aberaussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

***Oh Boy... THAT'S ONE OF THE MOST BLASPHEMOUS PIC I'VE EVER SEEN...

... MY GOD IS A MERCIFUL GOD, BUT DONT DO SUCH THING -- YOU DONT KNOW HOW TERRIBLE HE CAN BE ANGRY... i pitty that gal...***

... the statement is against the group or individuals who dared to do such immoral act...

...never thought some people would dare do that...
thanks for the info...


34 posted on 11/26/2004 7:12:52 PM PST by ChristianDefender (Never give the enemy a foothold in your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

It would appear that the jury is still out on that.

For one thing uncircumcised men are known to be at much greater risk of becoming infected with HIV than circumcised men. Over 40 studies have found that men who are circumcised have a lower risk of becoming infected with HIV from an infected sexual partner than uncircumcised men. Circumcised men are two to eight times less likely to contract HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases than uncircumcised men.

The explanation for this seems logical. The HIV virus targets certain cells called Langerhans cells that are present in abundance on the inner surface of the foreskin. These cells are likely the primary point of viral entry into the penis of an uncircumcised man. Langerhans cells possess HIV receptors, making them particularly susceptible to infection. Male circumcision may act to provide significant protection against HIV infection by removing most of the receptors.

Cervical cancer has been related to the presence of human papillomavirus infection. On this basis, an alternative hypothesis for the reduction of cervical cancer through circumcision has been proposed; namely, that there is a higher HPV infection rate among uncircumcised men. An international group of researchers conducted a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine that concluded that male circumcision is associated with a reduced risk of penile HPV infection and, in the case of men with a history of multiple sexual partners, a reduced risk of cervical cancer in their current female partners.

And then there is the matter of increased urinary tract infections (UTI's) etc., etc.


35 posted on 11/26/2004 7:13:04 PM PST by daylate-dollarshort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: socialismisinsidious

thanks a lot...


36 posted on 11/26/2004 7:13:59 PM PST by ChristianDefender (Never give the enemy a foothold in your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lutonian

Look over the entire site. What you see is the worst of it. What you will see is cutting edge work that aids the cause.

The problem is: who is in charge?


37 posted on 11/26/2004 7:19:02 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (From Ku Klux Klan to the modern era of the Koo Kleft Klan...the true RAT legacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: daylate-dollarshort
I'm not a doc or anything but everything you wrote sounds about right from what I've read

I still wonder what it would be like if I still had my forecastle, LOL.

39 posted on 11/26/2004 7:20:23 PM PST by benjaminjjones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
"Western culture is adopting piercing, toungue and ear mutilation, etc. This is only the next craze. We began doing this to our males long ago when we adopted the Jewish tradition of circumcision as an alleged "health" practice in American hospitals. Notice it's called "genital mutilation" when it involves females but when it's males, they call it "making them boys." Damned butchers and feminazies. Medical and reproductive privacy my fuzzy ass."

You all need some educating...There is a difference...a BIG difference. While the removal of some foreskin does desensitize the head of the male organ it doesn't make it impossible for you to enjoy sex or have orgasms.
Removal of the clitoris on a woman would be equivalent to cutting off the penis entirely...It is the primary sex organ of a woman...that is why the Muslim Bast@#$s cut it off, they are so afraid of their women and actually feel so inferior that they want to make sure sex is not enjoyable, unsatisfying, probably hurts and only to produce babies in the minds of their women.
40 posted on 11/26/2004 8:05:26 PM PST by doubtfullyhopefull (Muslim terror coming to a town near you, have a nice day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson