Genital Mutilation 'On the Increase in Europe'

WorldNetDaily ^ | 11-27-04 | wnd

[ChristianDefender]

hmmm... your pic is nice but those women's experience is far worst than that... your's maybe called piercing, theirs is called mutilation or "beheading"...

[sierrahome]

"Sorry, but female genital mutilation isn't equivalent to male circumcision. That is unless you think they cut off the entire penis when they circumcise males"

Exactly!

[ChristianDefender]

***They are removing the component responsible for the female orgasm. The cannot satisfy their women.***

...that's why non can convince me to become a muslim because i'm deeply troubled with this things and a lot more...

...how can u please God with such things?... removing a clitoris is like beheading a woman...

[CMOTB]

I would hardly equate male circumcision with "female circumcision" A more true example would be the equivalent of cutting off a mans penis. Hardly the same thing.

[ChristianDefender]

Oh Boy... THAT'S ONE OF THE MOST BLASPHEMOUS PIC I'VE EVER SEEN...

... MY GOD IS A MERCIFUL GOD, BUT DONT DO SUCH THING -- YOU DONT KNOW HOW TERRIBLE HE CAN BE ANGRY... i pitty that gal...

[WorkingClassFilth]

Hey, look, I report and you decide. Them is the facts.

[WorkingClassFilth]

Not valueless, but in BIG trouble. Wake up Dude!

[socialismisinsidious]

newzjunky has a point..sometimes just part of the clitoris is cut off which makes it more like what is done to males.
sometimes much, much more is cut...

the entire practice is disgusting and sad and I found this part ot the article amazing "..... press the government to consider genital mutilation an “act of violence”--- there is a thought.

good article on the vile practice: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/2313097.html

[benjaminjjones]

Western culture is adopting piercing, toungue and ear mutilation, etc.

Now there's a thought. Make genital mutilation (and/or sterilization) the admission price for all of the above.

AWESOME DUDE!

[aberaussie]

Here's Oleg Volk, a staunch defender of 2A rights...

Umm...a warning would have been nice. Yuck. Thanks a lot.

[ChristianDefender]

***Oh Boy... THAT'S ONE OF THE MOST BLASPHEMOUS PIC I'VE EVER SEEN...

... MY GOD IS A MERCIFUL GOD, BUT DONT DO SUCH THING -- YOU DONT KNOW HOW TERRIBLE HE CAN BE ANGRY... i pitty that gal...***

... the statement is against the group or individuals who dared to do such immoral act...

...never thought some people would dare do that...
thanks for the info...

[daylate-dollarshort]

It would appear that the jury is still out on that.

For one thing uncircumcised men are known to be at much greater risk of becoming infected with HIV than circumcised men. Over 40 studies have found that men who are circumcised have a lower risk of becoming infected with HIV from an infected sexual partner than uncircumcised men. Circumcised men are two to eight times less likely to contract HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases than uncircumcised men.

The explanation for this seems logical. The HIV virus targets certain cells called Langerhans cells that are present in abundance on the inner surface of the foreskin. These cells are likely the primary point of viral entry into the penis of an uncircumcised man. Langerhans cells possess HIV receptors, making them particularly susceptible to infection. Male circumcision may act to provide significant protection against HIV infection by removing most of the receptors.

Cervical cancer has been related to the presence of human papillomavirus infection. On this basis, an alternative hypothesis for the reduction of cervical cancer through circumcision has been proposed; namely, that there is a higher HPV infection rate among uncircumcised men. An international group of researchers conducted a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine that concluded that male circumcision is associated with a reduced risk of penile HPV infection and, in the case of men with a history of multiple sexual partners, a reduced risk of cervical cancer in their current female partners.

And then there is the matter of increased urinary tract infections (UTI's) etc., etc.

[ChristianDefender]

thanks a lot...

[WorkingClassFilth]

Look over the entire site. What you see is the worst of it. What you will see is cutting edge work that aids the cause.

The problem is: who is in charge?

[benjaminjjones]

I'm not a doc or anything but everything you wrote sounds about right from what I've read

I still wonder what it would be like if I still had my forecastle, LOL.

[doubtfullyhopefull]

"Western culture is adopting piercing, toungue and ear mutilation, etc. This is only the next craze. We began doing this to our males long ago when we adopted the Jewish tradition of circumcision as an alleged "health" practice in American hospitals. Notice it's called "genital mutilation" when it involves females but when it's males, they call it "making them boys." Damned butchers and feminazies. Medical and reproductive privacy my fuzzy ass."

You all need some educating...There is a difference...a BIG difference. While the removal of some foreskin does desensitize the head of the male organ it doesn't make it impossible for you to enjoy sex or have orgasms.
Removal of the clitoris on a woman would be equivalent to cutting off the penis entirely...It is the primary sex organ of a woman...that is why the Muslim Bast@#$s cut it off, they are so afraid of their women and actually feel so inferior that they want to make sure sex is not enjoyable, unsatisfying, probably hurts and only to produce babies in the minds of their women.