To: jocon307
"We're not considering Mr. Vang a suspect. We're considering him a possible witness," Am I missing something? This guy admits shooting unarmed people in the back and he is not a suspect??
11 posted on
11/26/2004 4:52:01 PM PST by
lancer
(If you are not with us, you are against us!)
To: lancer
"I missing something?"
Yes, yes, you are missing something. They don't consider him a suspect in the 2001 murder. He's definately the "accused" in the 2004 murders.
The article is a bit confusing. Bad writing is everywhere, especially in the daily papers!
12 posted on
11/26/2004 4:56:36 PM PST by
jocon307
(Jihad is world wide. Jihad is serious business. We ignore global jihad at our peril.)
To: lancer
It's "cop speak"....till they have something, they can't CHARGE him, therefore he's not "yet" a suspect.
Just give 'em time....
13 posted on
11/26/2004 4:57:39 PM PST by
Brad’s Gramma
(Proud Patriots dot com! Check it out!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson