Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reshaping the Electorate
Conservative Review / daily e-mail updates ^ | 11-26-04 | Michael Barone

Posted on 11/26/2004 8:48:02 AM PST by no dems

Reshaping the electorate Michael Barone (townhall.com/archive)

Amid the Cabinet reshuffling, little attention has been paid to the appointment of Bush campaign manager Ken Mehlman as Republican National Committee chairman. But Mehlman's appointment could turn out to be as significant for our politics as Condoleezza Rice's is likely to be for foreign policy.

If Karl Rove was the architect of George W. Bush's thumping re-election victory, Mehlman was the structural engineer who turned the plans into reality. Mehlman's great achieve- ment was to create a largely volunteer organization of 1.4 million people who turned out the vote in counties big and small for Bush. He managed this task the way Rudolph Giuliani managed the NYPD: by requiring metrics -- numerical goals, validated by independent parties -- to measure the work being done every week.

This enabled the Bush organization to plug holes and provide psychic rewards for those doing good work. No one (including Giuliani himself) thought Giuliani could cut crime in half in New York City; very few thought that Mehlman could produce 10 million new votes for Bush. But Giuliani did it, and so did Mehlman.

The surge in turnout was unusual for what was, after all, a rerun election. Turnout was down in 1956 when Dwight Eisenhower faced Adlai Stevenson a second time. Turnout was down in 1996 when Bill Clinton faced Ross Perot and a decorated World War II veteran a second time.

Many people figured they had made the decision already and didn't need to go to the polls again. Not so in 2004, when Bush faced a second liberal Democrat who had spent much of his career in the Senate. With the absentee votes in California and Washington finally counted, it appears that overall turnout was up 12 percent. John Kerry's popular vote was also 12 percent above Al Gore's. But the popular vote for Bush was up a stunning 20 percent. Before the election, some liberal commentators were claiming that Bush would win no votes he hadn't won in 2000. Not quite: He won 10 million more.

Bush's popular vote was up 23 percent in the 13 battle- ground states that decided the election. Kerry's paid- worker, union-led turnout drives in central cities nearly matched that -- his vote was up 21 percent over Gore's in the battlegrounds. But that wasn't enough to outdo the Bush volunteer efforts in the make-or-break states of Florida and Ohio.

Elsewhere, Bush had a bigger edge. His popular vote was up 21 percent in safe Bush states and 16 percent in safe Kerry states, compared to 12 percent and 5 percent for Kerry. The Bush organization literally reshaped the electorate. The 2000 exit poll showed an electorate that was 39 percent Democratic and 35 percent Republican. The 2004 exit poll, which was tilted toward Democrats, found a dead-heat: 37 percent to 37 percent. That means that Republican turnout was up 19 percent and Democratic turnout up only 7 percent. This is the most Republican electorate America has had since random-sample polling was invented.

Re-elected presidents seldom do much for their parties; certainly Reagan and Nixon didn't. Roosevelt did, and Bush evidently intends to also. Look for Mehlman to continue engineering volunteer organizations to increase Republican turnout and further reshape the electorate. Obvious targets are New Jersey and Virginia, which elect governors in 2005. Neither was a battleground state this fall; Bush ran better in New Jersey and a little worse in Virginia than expected, and Mehlman would like to make Virginia safer and put New Jersey in play.

Then there are the 2006 Senate races in Pennsylvania, where Republican Rick Santorum could face a serious challenge, and in Michigan and Minnesota, where freshman Democrats are likely to face serious challenges. John Kerry carried all three of these battleground states with just 51 percent of the vote. Mehlman wants to change those numbers by 2008.

Sam Walton made his fortune by selling goods at low prices in downscale rural and exurban communities where other retailers saw little profit. Mehlman won the election for Bush by increasing the Republican vote in downscale rural and exurban counties where neither party used to think many more votes could be won.

Wal-Mart is now the most successful retailer in history. Mehlman seeks to be the most successful party-builder ever. No one made much money betting against Sam Walton. I wouldn't bet against Ken Mehlman, either.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 2005; bushvictory; kenmehlman; mehlmanm; michaelbarone; reshaping; rnc
It just keeps getting better and better. I'm still gloating.
1 posted on 11/26/2004 8:48:02 AM PST by no dems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: no dems

hmmmm, link seems to be not working !

TIA


2 posted on 11/26/2004 9:01:07 AM PST by SIRTRIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

try this:

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/michaelbarone/mb20041122.shtml


3 posted on 11/26/2004 9:12:40 AM PST by mista science
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems
"Mehlman seeks to be the most successful party-builder ever."

For two years at most. Then he'll join the presidential campaign of the candidate he thinks is best capable of winning.

With his experience in managing a presidential campaign, his list of grassroots volunteers who actually produced votes, his list of rainmakers who can convince a hundred others to give the maximum, and his ability to recruit the best pollsters, media experts, direct mail firms, etc... it would be pretty safe to bet on his candidate.

But the vanity candidates letting their little sisters run their campaigns weill still whine that his candidate was annointed by "they".

4 posted on 11/26/2004 9:25:43 AM PST by bayourod (Don't Mess With West Texas Oil Field Trash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod

I believe along with the volunteer organization - which was in play in 2000 as well on the internet (Before Howie Dean) and the fact that Bush didn't go through a primary against other Republicans is what put him over the top.Also conservatives remembered what it was like with Clinton and felt Kerry was Clinton but lamer. I know it inspired me to volunteer like crazy. If the Republicans don't eat their own- we will do it again in 2008!


5 posted on 11/26/2004 10:23:57 AM PST by newzhawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: newzhawk
"If the Republicans don't eat their own- we will do it again in 2008! "

Unfortunately we will have a gaggle of vanity candidates hustling contributions and trying to build name recognition for themselves and their fund-raising organization.

They will make false charges against the legitimate candidates and promise impossible results.

Remember Bauer, Buchanan and Keyes all promising that if elected they would outlaw all abortions. Buchanan promised to do it on his first day in office.

This election it will probably be vanity candidates trying to scam money out of the anti-Mexican crowd by promising to immediately deport all illegals, imprison all business owners for life without trial, and building an airtight wall around the U.S.

It would be funny to watch them compete with each other for the extremists' money if it weren't for the tragic fact that so many people will be fooled into sending them money.

6 posted on 11/26/2004 11:33:28 AM PST by bayourod (Don't Mess With West Texas Oil Field Trash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: no dems
"Neither was a battleground state this fall; Bush ran better in New Jersey and a little worse in Virginia than expected, and Mehlman would like to make Virginia safer and put New Jersey in play.

I wonder what Mr. Barrone means about Virginia? Bush won by 8.04% over Gore in 2000, now Bush won Virginia by 8.20% over Kerry in 2004...

dvwjr

7 posted on 11/26/2004 12:18:20 PM PST by dvwjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
This election it will probably be vanity candidates trying to scam money out of the anti-Mexican crowd by promising to immediately deport all illegals, imprison all business owners for life without trial, and building an airtight wall around the U.S.

I made a necessary correction to your comment:

This election it will probably be vanity candidates trying to scam money out of the anti-Mexican illegal alien lawbreaker crowd by promising to immediately deport all illegals, imprison all business owners for life without trial, and building an airtight wall around the U.S.

8 posted on 11/26/2004 2:21:40 PM PST by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: no dems
New Jersey >>

Jon Corzine will buy the governor's seat as he did with the senate. He will spend his 65 million in the inner city with donations to agencies and sponsor banquets, dinners, and free busing to the polls with a provided baby sitter to watch the kids when you vote. He will promise free healthcare and universal education to all. The homeless will be picked up fed and given money for drugs and liquor after they vote.

If a RINO is not picked for the ticket, the rank and file RINO in the legislature and party will work against the conservative choice as they did in 2001 with Schundler.
9 posted on 11/27/2004 9:07:21 PM PST by Coleus (There is Plenty of Room For all of God's Creatures, Right Next to the mashed potatoes! Happy TG Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson