Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BureaucratusMaximus
If they broke the law, they should do the time.

I agree; but is the law they broke a good law or a bad law? I say the latter.

A non-violent heroin user or pot smoker can cause violent consequences to themselves and others if behind a wheel of a car or in possesion of a firearm for example.

Ditto for alcohol users ... but I don't think that's a good argument for banning alcohol. Do you?

I don't want to get into a tirade about legalizing drugs with you...the whole notion is useless from this small l libertarian unless you eliminate health care entitlements, government regulations on health care, have a society where people actually bare the full responsibility for their choices

Health care costs go up because of drinking and unhealthy eating, but I don't think that's a good argument for banning alcohol or giving government control of adults' food choices. Do you?

48 posted on 11/27/2004 11:37:11 AM PST by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Know your rights; BureaucratusMaximus
"but I don't think that's a good argument for banning alcohol or giving government control of adults' food choices. Do you?"

No. But I think it is an excellent reason for getting rid of health care entitlements, which was his point. Which you missed.

51 posted on 11/27/2004 2:00:07 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson