Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

God Is Banned From Thanksgiving In Maryland Public Schools
useless-knowledge.com ^ | Nov. 23, 2004 | Sher Zieve

Posted on 11/25/2004 12:22:30 AM PST by Exton1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 11/25/2004 12:22:31 AM PST by Exton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Exton1
Charles Ridgell, St. Mary's County Public Schools curriculum and instruction director, said: "We teach about Thanksgiving from a purely historical perspective, not from a religious perspective."

He is a hard-boiled liar.

2 posted on 11/25/2004 12:27:27 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
Department of Curriculum and Instruction
St. Mary's County Public Schools
23160 Moakley Street, Suite 101
Leonardtown, MD 20650
Phone (301) 475-5511, option 5 Fax (301) 475-4229

Dr. Charles Ridgell Director of Secondary Education

3 posted on 11/25/2004 12:27:45 AM PST by Exton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
Lets see, they are banning God in Maryland, and the Constitution in California, in Alabama they carted away the Ten Commandments on a furniture dolly.

Seems someone is trying to send us a message.

4 posted on 11/25/2004 12:31:00 AM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf

Send us a message, HELL!

The Godless left is doing all they can to remove any semblance of faith from the public square.

There's a backlash acomin'; BIGtime!


5 posted on 11/25/2004 12:33:58 AM PST by clee1 (Islam is a deadly plague; liberalism is the AIDS virus that prevents us from defending ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Seems someone is trying to send us a message.

And who could that be, hmmmmm?
You don't suppose it could be, oh, I dunno,
maybe SATAN?!!!


6 posted on 11/25/2004 12:36:06 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ppaul

Hehe....


7 posted on 11/25/2004 12:43:03 AM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: clee1
Send us a message, HELL! The Godless left is doing all they can to remove any semblance of faith from the public square.

Uh, I would guess, that would be their message.

8 posted on 11/25/2004 12:45:59 AM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lindykim; DirtyHarryY2K; Siamese Princess; Ed Current; Grampa Dave; Luircin; gonow; John O; ...

Moral Absolutes Ping. One last one for the night.

Actually, I'm glad that public screwels are being so upfront about their loyalty to the ACLU, atheism, historical revisionism, hatred towards religion (with the notable exception of Islam - things that make you go Hmmmm...), feminism, and last but not least, "gay"ism.

Today we've seen the Declaration of Independence declared vertboten in a California school, a dudge - I mean judge - decreeing that schoolchildren can have immersion in Islam while not a Bible can be read or prayer pass their lips, and now Thanksgiving is only historical.

Giving thanks to WHOM? And since George Washington declared the first Thanksgiving officially for the newly independent United States of America (can't remember the date, it's been posted here today and Rush read it), the historical relevance and religious significance cannot be separated.

Anyway, it's better to know your enemies. Let them be who they are, personally I'm tired of being Mr. Nice Guy.

Let me know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.


9 posted on 11/25/2004 12:46:05 AM PST by little jeremiah (Moral absolutes are what make humans human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

The first rule is that there can be no more David Souters or John Paul Stevens appointed to the Supreme Court by Republican presidents. Dumbo Jerry Ford was told NOT to appoint Stevens back in 1976 by conservative senators but he did it anyway, with defiance. As a consequence we have had a reliable ACLU supporter on the highest court for nearly 30 years.


10 posted on 11/25/2004 12:58:45 AM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: laconic

I hope to God that GWB appoints some real conservatives to the SCOTUS. No more grey areas that turn out to be leftists. With the majorities in the House and Senate, and no re-election dancing necessary, there's no reason to shilly shally.

With any luck, two may have to be replaced - you think three maybe?

Not wishing ill to any of the judges (with one or two exceptions...) - just that two or three are pretty old and may want to step down. How old is Bader Meinhoff Ginsberg, anyway?)


11 posted on 11/25/2004 1:05:59 AM PST by little jeremiah (Moral absolutes are what make humans human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: laconic
I've read that Souter was "recruited" to the dark side by the late Pamela Harriman.

Souter was a social cipher who had no friends and no bedmate (of whatever gender), so Pamela fixed him up, and guests at her parties told Souter how smart he was, and the rest is history.

It perhaps helped that Laurence Tribe of Harvard has been using his former students who get clerk appointments to the Supreme Court to back-channel "helpful" precedents to Justices Souter and Kennedy, according to a column by Bob Novak. Novak also said Kennedy was lobbied by Tribe directly during a Viennese judicial congress, during the reconsideration of Roe vs. Wade (in which case, btw, one of the counsellors for Roe and intervenors was an attorney named Ruth Bader Ginzburg). It was illegal for Tribe and Kennedy to confer on U.S. soil, so Tribe just intercepted Kennedy outside U.S. jurisdiction. Larry, such chutzpah! -- but we know how important it is not to have an overreaching, juridical-imperial liberal precedent overturned! Heck, the overturning itself would be a precedent!

That's what I love about liberals. When the going gets tough, the stuff gets flowing.

12 posted on 11/25/2004 1:16:40 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
It has got to be the most frustrating thing on the planet to argue with a liberal about the so called "separation clause".

You can tell them until you are blue in the face, that it does not exist, and they look at you like your crazy.

On one occasion, I pulled my pocket copy of the Constitution out and asked this idiot to find it, after he claimed repeatedly that it is there.

He got frustrated when he could not see it and claimed I had ripped the page out.

Then he spotted the CATO institute name on the book and claimed it was a Republican version.

I tried, oh man I tried! But he never budged, he never accepted that it did not have a separation clause.

I determined that when he read the Establishment clause, that he read it correctly as not referring to separation.

It is amazing that a lie told thousands of times becomes the truth, and believers of that truth will accept no other.

13 posted on 11/25/2004 1:32:59 AM PST by Cold Heat (What are fears but voices awry?Whispering harm where harm is not and deluding the unwary.-Wordsworth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

Souter at least was a cipher, a nonentity that Bush Sr. thought necessary to push thru a Dem Senate while unelected Jerry Ford knew exactly where Stevens stood.


14 posted on 11/25/2004 1:50:35 AM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat
Just so we know what we are talking about, the First Amendments says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

What will it take in America for the ACLU and the Supreme Court actually to recognize the WHOLE statement, not just the part they like?

15 posted on 11/25/2004 3:01:11 AM PST by NetValue (Trust the cobra before you trust the liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Exton1

Maryland: a democrat state where your children are indoctrinated into homosexuality as a good thing and as a form of family....and where the very mention of GOD in the classroom is forbidden and will get you sued by the ACLU. What is wrong with THIS picture?


16 posted on 11/25/2004 3:04:30 AM PST by NetValue (Trust the cobra before you trust the liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
"...anyone but, God’. Charles Ridgell, St. Mary's County Public Schools..."

How ironic...they want to diminish God and religious beliefs in America's history. Some deny their fore-parents were religious people.

If so Mr. Ridgell...explain the name of your County!

17 posted on 11/25/2004 3:22:24 AM PST by daffyduct
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NetValue; All
Before Maryland gets an unfair rep for this (we have enough problems as it is), it is a complete falsehood that the state has banned God or religion from classrooms, Thanksgiving holiday or not. Governor Robert Ehrlich publicly stated yesterday that no such ban existed, and even opined that teaching Thanksgiving without mentioning the religious underpinnings is nearly impossible.

In Maryland, public school curricula are determined at the local level. Pound on the character who said this (if he did), not the state or its current leadership.

18 posted on 11/25/2004 4:22:34 AM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: daffyduct

St. Mary's County was named long before the attacks on God came about in the US. I am sure if it were being named now it would not be allowed to use the name. As a matter of fact St. Marys County was at one time a largely catholic community formed by people fleeing Religious persecution in England.


19 posted on 11/25/2004 4:27:53 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Please add me to your ping list.

My children attend the St. Mary's County public schools, and I hadn't heard about this from any of them. I'm not sure the context in which this statement was made; maybe it was discussing an elementary school Thanksgiving lunch or something.

Your question about "giving thanks to whom?" is exactly on point. It's like being "blessed" or "gifted." Those blessings and gifts must come from somewhere, but that "somewhere" is not addressed by the atheists.

This is all so ironic, when one considers that St. Mary's county was founded by Catholics seeking religious freedom. Many families in the county date back to the early settlers.

The county is very Republican, went for W in a big way, but the schools are definitely operated by the left.

20 posted on 11/25/2004 4:41:17 AM PST by Blue Eyes (Operating behind enemy lines in Pajamastan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson