Back off.
You know as well as I do that the NO, (all other things being equal) is a perfectly valid Rite.
And you ALSO know as well as I do that, for example, the Green Bay Diocese was a "divorce mill" LONG before VatII--it was known for that problem in the 1940's and '50's.
That was before VatII--and Rembert Weakland was ordained before VatII--we could go on.
Post/propter fallacy. 20 yards, loss of down.
"Back OFF"????
Umm.......excuse me sir, but who exactly do you think you are? I was not posting to you, and most importantly I do have the right to express my opinion here - whether you agree with it or not. If you have a contrary opinion - fine......then spit it out, and provide an argument for your position.
That I will always respect.