Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
You keep saying "never retracted it".

Let's say there's a priest who no longer believes the doctrines of the Church, specifically regarding transubstantiation. He has no intention of consecrating the Eucharist because he doesn't believe it is possible, or real. Isn't that a "retraction" even if he doesn't formally announce it?

Now let's suppose, not that this could ever happen /sarcasm, this priest becomes an active agent for satan, wouldn't he be more effective as such if everyone in his parish etc. was unaware that he secretly retracted his intention?

152 posted on 11/24/2004 8:42:49 PM PST by murphE (fight terrorism in the womb END ABORTION NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: murphE

If the priest never formally retracts his intention, then his celebration of sacraments is valid.


156 posted on 11/24/2004 8:56:09 PM PST by sinkspur ("It is a great day to be alive. I appreciate your gratitude." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: murphE

Thank you for posting that! You saved me a lot of verbiage, and made points similar to my own using some very good, concise language. Thanks!


161 posted on 11/24/2004 9:07:36 PM PST by thor76 (Vade retro, Draco! Crux sacra sit mihi lux! St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: murphE

Use a real live example of a heretical former priest ... maybe John Dominic Crossnan


205 posted on 11/25/2004 8:40:47 AM PST by Jaded ((Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society. - Mark Twain))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson