Posted on 11/24/2004 8:34:13 AM PST by NorthOf45
Two different missions, two different services. The Army's decision to axe Comanche was long overdue. It was an aircraft built on marketing hype and little else. I can't speak with authority on the V-22, other than I know the USMC desperately needs something to replace their ancient CH-46 fleet.
I'm 100% for that idea. Let the CEO types, Board members and the Generals who want this thing so bad fly it to work every day for a year.
Great concept, but this thing can't fly.
The Comanche did not have any active ASE and relied soley on passive measures to avoid detection and air defense systems. It had little in the way of armor plating and even the windscreen was non-ballistic tolerant plexiglass. These design measures were adopted to reduce weight in order to increase rate of climb performance. The transmission and turreted gun system were even re-engineered to accomodate weight restrictions.
Yeah, My mistake. Still, it should be cancelled.
It should also be noted that this was a test flight in extreme weather conditions with the expressed purpose to test performance of de-icing equipment on the blades. A chunk of(melting)ice flying off of one rotor into the other set of blades at high rpm could be the culprit.
30 to 45 degrees might work, but I have no idea how well it flys in that configuration.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.