Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experimental Chopper Loses Part of Blade (Lands in NS, Canada)
The Daily News ^ | November 24, 2004 | Chris Lambie

Posted on 11/24/2004 8:34:13 AM PST by NorthOf45

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Darksheare
Yeah, I don't get why they killed the RAH-66 Comanche, but kept the Osprey

Two different missions, two different services. The Army's decision to axe Comanche was long overdue. It was an aircraft built on marketing hype and little else. I can't speak with authority on the V-22, other than I know the USMC desperately needs something to replace their ancient CH-46 fleet.

41 posted on 11/25/2004 6:11:07 PM PST by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer

I'm 100% for that idea. Let the CEO types, Board members and the Generals who want this thing so bad fly it to work every day for a year.

Great concept, but this thing can't fly.


42 posted on 11/25/2004 6:13:38 PM PST by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GBA
I heard that it was also a very soft airframe and would be very easy to knock down. Is that true?

The Comanche did not have any active ASE and relied soley on passive measures to avoid detection and air defense systems. It had little in the way of armor plating and even the windscreen was non-ballistic tolerant plexiglass. These design measures were adopted to reduce weight in order to increase rate of climb performance. The transmission and turreted gun system were even re-engineered to accomodate weight restrictions.

43 posted on 11/25/2004 6:16:27 PM PST by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Yeah, My mistake. Still, it should be cancelled.


44 posted on 11/25/2004 6:20:21 PM PST by Haro_546 (Christian Zionist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
This article doesn't give enough details, but it isn't that uncommon to have a blade de-laminate in small pieces or for a tip cap to sling off. While disconcering to the crew, it isn't usually a catastrophic situation.

It should also be noted that this was a test flight in extreme weather conditions with the expressed purpose to test performance of de-icing equipment on the blades. A chunk of(melting)ice flying off of one rotor into the other set of blades at high rpm could be the culprit.

45 posted on 11/25/2004 6:29:11 PM PST by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
These drawings show the problem even better. In order for the props to clear the ground the landing gear would have to be about 8 feet long. I always thought this was a major problem for the Osprey.

30 to 45 degrees might work, but I have no idea how well it flys in that configuration.


46 posted on 11/25/2004 6:34:38 PM PST by SC Swamp Fox (Aim small, miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson