Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vbmoneyspender

This seems to be about personal retribution to me. That is the point of the article, and I think that making it an argument about "smaller government" is a diversion.

You don't think there was any personal retribution involved? It just happened to be that all the wasteful road projects were in these 21 districts.


14 posted on 11/24/2004 9:03:18 AM PST by nj26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: nj26
This seems to be about personal retribution to me. That is the point of the article

There's nothing personal about it.

Istook made it clear that if reps wanted Amtrak funding it would count as part or all of their transportation allotment. The reps went ahead and chose Amtrak and their only defense is that they "didn't believe" Istook would follow through. Well, he's on honest guy, and he followed through.

The reps got most of the Amtrak funding they wanted and lost most of the other projects they wanted. Sounds fair to me!

19 posted on 11/24/2004 10:08:54 AM PST by JohnnyZ ("Thought I was having trouble with my adding. It's all right now." - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson