[nj26]

"Is it possible that Istook is doing the right thing by reigning in gov't spending?"

Sure, if he cut the pork-barrel spending in EVERY congressional district, he would be doing the right thing.

But, this seems to be about retribution against other Republicans, rather than smaller government. Otherwise, why target only these districts?

[vbmoneyspender]

Sure, if he cut the pork-barrel spending in EVERY congressional district, he would be doing the right thing

I see liberals all the time making variants of that argument that "Unless you are going to do something everywhere, you shouldn't do it anywhere." A classic of that type of argument is the argument the left makes that unless we are willing to get rid of every dictator, we shouldn't get rid of any particular dictator like Hussein.

Wouldn't you agree that that type of argument is really an intellectually dishonest dodge. What you are really saying when you say that is that you don't want any cuts in spending. Isn't that the case?

[gwjack]

I have not read the bill; but rest assured, Rep. Istook will have cut pork that he was able to see, INCLUDING HIS OWN DISTRICT. It is well known around here that he opposed federal funding of a light rail system in OKC even though it had the favor of all other local/national politicians. He has questioned the amount of appropriation for I-40, which is crumbling. He wants to restore fiscal sanity and eliminate wasteful practices of the past.

It seems to me that the when representatives did not prioritize their desires as asked, they are to fault -- if there is fault. He can't represent all districts. When he asks for input, he shouldn't be ignored.

Frankly, I think that he is "spot on."

Gwjack