Still pulling the JW routine of twisting the truth and blaming the victim ?
You know as well as I that the priority of the JW organization is NOT to protect the children. It is to protect the 'scriptural headship' of the father over his family. Had they caught him pulling the child's pants down their response would have been to lecture the wife on how if she had been more loving and supportive her husband would not have been driven to this and since he has assured them it will never happen again the subject is closed. But she will have to undergo more counselling on fulfilling her wifely duties.
I wasn't.
Man, this is the last time I bring up an old thread:).
Please do not make further posts to me. You can say whatever you want (true or not) about whomever you please but do not include me on it.