Let's reproduce the question to which the preceding purports to be an answer.
You asked this:
Did the "land whale" 'With legs' give birth to a sea whale without legs?That's a funny thing not to know. Thus, my question:
If you don't have a clue what evolution has to say about how species arise, how do you know it's false?That done, NOW let's look again at your answer.
Cause what "evolution has to say about how species arise" doesn't pass the laugh test.
Good heavens! You might as well have said, "Because it's false." That can't be much of an answer, especially since to all appearances you genuinely don't know beans about what you're talking about.
You're begging the question here. Something is seriously lacking in your discourse. Do you know how to answer a question by actually reading the question and answering it?
You go on with more questions which further cement the notion that you are unfamiliar not only with what the evidence is for the evolution of whales, but how in general evolution says things happen.
Do you know by what mechanism evolutionary change happens? If you do know that, what's your excuse for asking such ignorant questions? Again--and let's try for some honesty this time--if you don't know that, how do you know it's false?
>Do you know by what mechanism evolutionary change happens?<
Yes.
It doesn't.
Yes, I know several of the theories that have been advanced. None of them hold water.