If you don't have a clue what evolution has to say about how species arise, how do you know it's false?
What are you, a dummy? A fossil whale with legs is a "lame" transitional. He wants a "true" transitional.
Cause what "evolution has to say about how species arise" doesn't pass the laugh test.
Its largely unscientific and speculative.
It extrapolates adaptation within a species as "proof" of the leap to a "new" species.
The "examples" in your prior post don't cut it.
I'm not interested in "monsters".
I want to see the before and after.
What did the "non-seal" mother of the seal look like?
Which of the whales was first a seal?
Where are the examples if there was something in between?
Don't give me the "If you don't have a clue..." crap.
What are the answers?