To: G Larry
Don't flatter yourself, my confidence is NOT shaken.
Of course it isn't. You've already decided on what the truth is, thus any "facts" that get in your way are irrelevant. Reality be damned, you know how things are!
Changing teeth are not representative of species in mid-transition.
Why not?
Depending on which direction you believe whales evolved, (land to sea or vice versa), why aren't there examples of more than a vestige of legs?
What, specifically, would you want to see?
Did the species transition in a single generation?
No, of course not.
Across the globe?
No, of course not. Why would you expect such a thing unless you are fundamentally ignorant regarding the way that evolution works?
183 posted on
11/28/2004 4:52:10 PM PST by
Dimensio
(Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
To: Dimensio
>Why would you expect such a thing unless you are fundamentally ignorant regarding the way that evolution works?<
It doesn't, so I am.
Did the "land whale" 'With legs' give birth to a sea whale without legs? If there were generations where the legs atrophyed or became fins, where are the fossils, illustrating that transition?
184 posted on
11/28/2004 5:05:08 PM PST by
G Larry
(Time to update my "Support John Thune!" tagline. Thanks to all who did!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson