Exactly my point. Religious horror prevents you from being able to correctly state what Darwin or any other evolutionist even says. Whether or not you have actually read anything other than from creationist pamphlets, you can only parrot the creationist pamphlet distortions.
The rest of your post has nothing to do with science at all. You should leave the education of people who want to study science alone.
I believe it is you who are making unwarranted assumptions. First, you have no idea what my religious beliefs are. (Do not infer anything from the fact that I graduated from a Catholic university, so did a lot of Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and atheists.) Second, I have never read a pamphlet on this topic from any source. Third, the purpose of my last discourse was to answer the inferred question you asked, which I perceived to be "If not Darwin's theory, then what?".
The fact that you wish to label anything that does not suit your purpose as unscientific only suggests that you need to acquire the vision to make the great leap forward beyond a beleaguered and indefensible theory.
As for your tag line, I believe in Apokatastasis.
Hope you're having a wonderful holiday weekend!!!