you don't know the facts of the case, yet you shoot off your mouth on the other thread, thinking the 'racist northern rednecks' claim had merit. Way to go!
The facts, as reported:
Two were out, one with a gun. Came back and saw shooter on stand.
Two called back to cabin to see if anyone should be on stand. Three more joined them. None with guns.
Shooter got down, started to leave. Walked about 40 yards. Removed scope. Started firing.
One of the victims radioed back to cabin that they had been shot. Three more came out to location, unarmed, likely thinking it was just a hunting accident. They too were shot.
These aren't facts they are one person's testimony; what if they shot first but won't admit it? Only those who were there know what happened, and if both sides fired shots we likely never will, since you can't tell who fired first.