When there are few months until Ukraine president
When there are few months until Ukraine presidents elections one of the main candidates from opposition Victor Uschenko felt that the ground is going away under him. Nationalists stand stood him and his rating in bad. Ukraine citizens among whom is a good number of Russians and Jews truly fear Yuschenko coming into power. It will mean prosperity of anti-Semitism and xenophobia because several politics in Yuschenko election headquarters dont really cover their ultra nationalistic views. Feeling that his rating falls down, Yuschenko and his accomplices try with any methods achieve their aims. There is a plan in Yuschenko headquarters how to initiate civil commotions on the background of allegedly falsified elections. There were no elections but opposition has already prepared declaration about their falsification. Of course it is the best method to turn the defeat to victory, if especially Yuschenko will be helped by the USA But does Ukraine, its neighbors and European partners really need it? Today Ukraine economy is on the rise. The GNP rises, inflation rates reduces, average wages increase. People need stability but opposition wanna shock. We must not give them does it!
Soros is Arriving at Ukraine. Export of Revolutions
// Tatiana Ivanenko // Partaktiv // 24.03.04 // http://partaktiv.info/main/40616795d3daa/
In the article, the author states that G. Soros, in order to carry out successful machinations with national currencies, actively affects the policy of the country by trying to establish necessary-for-him regime in certain countries. The author describes political machinations of G. Soros in Yugoslavia (overthrow of S. Miloshevich), Georgia (overthrow of Ye. Shevarnadze). The author states that activities of Soros-related foundations leads to political instability in countries. The author believes that the future visit of Soros to Ukraine is related to the fact that G. Soros is trying to use revolution-based technologies in Ukraine.
George Soros Made a Decision to Closely Deal with Ukraine
// Denis Olzhych // Izvestiya -Ukraine // 25.03.04
The main leitmotif of this article is set forth in its very beginning: Ukrainian opposition is often visited by foreign guests (H. Severinsen, M. Albright and finally by G. Soros) which image is morally stained. Therefore, the article is directed at discrediting G. Soros just before his visit to Ukraine. The author points out that billions of Soros were gained by dishonest way that is evidenced by the penalty charged over him by French court for machinations with shares of Societe Generale, Swiss bank. Main scheme of Soros: destabilization with selfish intents" The author highlights machinations by Soros in the finance market and at political arena.
Finances:
Main strategy informational attach which will lead to a market panic.
In 1997 98, Soros caused the Asian economic crisis. Such crisis affected Ukraine too. The author says that Ukrainians, who lost their money then as a result of rapid inflation, must be thankful to Soros for such a result. In1997, Soros caused the crisis in Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore and Philippines. Then, the Indonesian President publicly called Soros as a bandit".
Politics:
At first, Soros focused its activities on exporting scientific brains from post-Soviet countries to the USA through the system of international exchanges and grants. Due to Soros activities, the USA has acquired scientists who possessed secret and extra-secret technologies: biochemists, physicists, software developers, specialists from aviation and space industries.
The method of capture by Soros of countries is too simple: to buy up educated and perspective oppositionists and then assist them in coming to power. In doing so, Soros has captured Serbia and then Georgia. In these countries, he financed illegal military units: "Otpor" (Serbia), "Kmara" (Georgia), as well as UNA-UNSO in Ukraine just before civil disturbances occurred on March 9, 2001.
The author says that results of the Soros activities ares as follows: genocide of Serbs, American protectorate in Kosovo, repressions and threat of new civil war in Georgia. Soros acts under authorization of American authorities, and the criticizing of his activities by Bush administration is an umbrella and not more. After all, the State Department and CIA authorize Soros to make the dirtiest operations. The author makes a conclusion that Ukraine will be a new victim of Soros. He has already allocated (through his IRF) 350,000 US dollars in order to create the media holding that must conduct pre-electoral propaganda. Soros tried to interfere with Ukraines affairs before, when in 2001 he called L. Kuchma to assign his powers to V. Yuschenko and allocated in total 100,000,000 US dollars for supporting Ukrainian state and developing open society. At the end of the article, the author calls the Ukrainian authorities to restrict the freedom of moving of Soros, who is considered a foreign agent affecting the state affairs, within Ukrainian territory.
Soros is arriving at Ukraine. Part 2. Export of revolutions
// Tatiana Ivanenko // Partaktiv // 24.03.04 // http://partaktiv.info/main/40616795d3daa/v
In the article, the author states that G. Soros, in order to carry out successful machinations with national currencies, actively affects the policy of the country by trying to establish necessary-for-him regime in certain countries. The author describes political machinations of G. Soros in Yugoslavia (overthrow of S. Miloshevich), Georgia (overthrow of Ye. Shevarnadze). The author states that activities of Soros-related foundations leads to political instability in countries. The author believes that the future visit of Soros to Ukraine is related to the fact that G. Soros is trying to use revolution-based technologies in Ukraine.
Well, if the reports of Russian military intervention are true, then we have to ask the following?
1. Just who is the military in the Ukraine loyal to? The civil authorities?
2. What is Poland doing? Not just her people, but her government and military, have they sealed the Eastern border, if they do, then it is a sure barometer that they expect trouble.
3. Do we even have any kind of contingency plan for something like this? I am sure we have something, but is it enough and just who in heck are we intervening potentially in support of? (aka, could this result in a direct confrontation with the Russians?) Now I am not doubting GWB, or the people he has around him, but these are some serious questions that need asking.
4. Finally, how nasty can this get? I am sure we can all speculate, but Mr. Head, and others, it's time to step up, because this could either go the Aug. 1991 route, or Bosnia, supersized.