Paper Drops 'Asian' Malkin, Too Anti-Liberal

NewsMax ^ | Tuesday, Nov. 23, 2004 8:50 a.m. EST | Carl Limbacher

[SuziQ]

Just shows these liberals are scared to death of strong, smart women!

[WuzaDem]

"Umm, this isn't censorship. She has no Constitutional right to be in the paper, and you are still free to read what she has to say at her website. Now if the government shut her down and gagged her, that's censorship.

Let's get our terms right."

OK, How about "biased"?

[GOP_1900AD]

Made my day ...

[GOP_1900AD]

Filipino ...

[cyborg]

Sounds like Kimora Lee Simmons. She looks like her too, so I was wondering.

[Baytovin]

Well, to borrow a phrase used often by Liberals...."She's being punished and denied the right to make a living strictly because she speaks her mind".

I wonder if they will show their support for her as strongly as they did for the Ditsi Chunks, Linda Ronstadt...

[iconoclast]

Thanks for pointing out the good news about Molly. ;o)

Seriously, maybe this paper is really trying to lower the level of discord. If so, I can't argue with them.

[TOUGH STOUGH]

I know. The question was rhetorical.

[Burlem]

Isn't it odd that my post and 78m and 79 have a disagreement as to terms.

Censorship to me is disallowing someone to be heard. The paper no longer accepts MIchelle Malkins column because one person complained that is, in my mind censorship.

Some have called to my local paper complaining about Ivens or Diana West who is one of the conservative writers. The response by the editors are they give both sides of the issue, giving equal time to the guest writers...Isn't that the way it should be?

[thegreatbeast]

I think that's " a chill wynde blowin'".

[BufordP]

This is why I haven't subscribed to a mainstream newspaper in years.

[freepatriot32]

People, it's time to open the Wuppass.

I agree :-)