Posted on 11/23/2004 1:51:05 AM PST by kattracks
Gobble, gobble. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) was in keeping with the spirit of the season when he denounced the most recent omnibus congressional appropriations bill as ``one big fat turkey,'' albeit, a holiday bird that was ``packed with pork,'' not stuffing.
One Washington, D.C., watchdog group has identified some 12,000 earmarks for special projects in the $388 billion spending plan which is on its way to the president's desk. The cost to taxpayers? Some $16 billion, or 4 percent of the total.
And in that most partisan of cities - after an election leaving Democrats and Republicans almost irreparably polarized or so we're told - isn't it amazing that members of Congress can put their differences aside for that most fundamental of political interests - their own?
Sen. Ted Stevens certainly made the most of his final year as Appropriations Committee chairman, too. Courtesy of the 81-year-old Alaska Republican, taxpayers from Maine to New Mexico will be footing the bill for a $900,000 aquarium in Ketchikan and a lovely $150,000 botanical garden in Anchorage, among many other ``priorities.'' In fact, a New York Times report pointed out that per capita federal spending in Alaska is almost double the national average, having grown 50 percent since Stevens became the grand pooh-bah of discretionary spending in 1997.
Concerned about the future of wine production in Washington state, hydroponic tomatoes in Ohio and maple syrup in Vermont? Don't be. Some $100 million is set aside in research grants for these and other agriculture imperatives.
And once President Bush [related, bio]
puts his signature to the measure, the enduring mystery surrounding the history of mariachi music will be answered by Las Vegas schools for a mere $25,000.
McCain has long taken aim at his colleagues' outrageous spending practices to no avail. Short of a congressional fiscal metamorphosis, the only viable solution is to give the president line-item veto power. Perhaps McCain and President Bush can chat about a strategy for winning support for such a budget measure while cruising the Potomac aboard the presidential yacht Sequoia. At least the $2 million earmarked for the Navy to buy the ship back from its private owners would be put to some good use.
even McCain agrees with us on this one?
This nicely illustrates the problem -- "My guy is doing just fine. All the others are screwed-up."
As long as 'my guy' brings home pork, then pork there shall be.
Back to normal for the US Congress, isn't it? Sad.
Until the President is granted the line item veto expect MUCH more of the same.
WASHINGTON (Nov. 24) - Austerity in big-ticket government programs hasn't dulled lawmakers' appetite for special interest spending items that curry favor back home.
The spending plan awaiting President Bush's signature is packed with them, doling out $4 million for an Alabama fertilizer development center, $1 million each for a Norwegian American Foundation in Seattle and a "Wild American Shrimp Initiative," and more, much more.
Despite soaring deficits, lawmakers from both parties who approved the $388 billion package last weekend set plenty of money aside for home-district projects like these, knowing they sow goodwill among special interests and voters.
They also raised the ire of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., a pork-barrel critic who took to the Senate floor to ask whether shrimp are so unruly and lacking initiative that the government must spend $1 million on them.
"Why does the U.S. taxpayer need to fund this 'no shrimp left behind' act?" he asked.
Among items in the package: $335,000 to protect North Dakota's sunflowers from blackbirds, $2.3 million for an animal waste management research lab in Bowling Green, Ky., $50,000 to control wild hogs in Missouri, and $443,000 to develop salmon-fortified baby food.
Sen. Richard Shelby, an Alabama Republican who serves on the Senate Appropriations Committee, won dozens of special items for his state - enough to fill 20 press releases.
In one aimed at northern Alabama, Shelby took credit for the $4 million budgeted for the International Fertilizer Development Center. "In addition to the important research conducted at this facility, the facility employs numerous Muscle Shoals-area residents," he noted.
Government watchdog Frank Clemente contends such special spending - often based more on a lawmaker's clout on appropriations committees than on objective factors such as a state's population - winds up costing even those who win a new road, park or research project.
"I think that's the biggest unfortunate thing about these special earmarks - they eat up billions of dollars," said Clemente, spokesman for Public Citizen. "Meanwhile they're cutting billions of dollars for environmental programs, or education programs or cops on the beat or what have you. That's kind of the unintended effect or the secret effect of these programs."
The time-honored practice flourished despite the ballooning national debt, less money for federal programs and rising concern about how government will finance the futures of Medicare and Social Security.
When Bush first took office, he vowed to cut pet projects from the federal budget, but the president has yet to veto a single spending bill. He is expected to sign the new plan as well.
Within hours of the spending bill's passage, lawmakers were touting the projects they brought home to constituents - a reminder that in federal budgets what is derided as pork-barrel spending by one constituency can be embraced by another as local assistance.
Missouri Republican Sens. Kit Bond and Jim Talent and Republican Rep. Jo Ann Emerson on Monday announced federal money for three-dozen projects in southern Missouri, including $50,000 for wild-hog control.
Ohio Reps. Stephanie Tubbs Jones, a Democrat, and Steven LaTourette, a Republican, boasted about $350,000 for music education programs at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in Cleveland.
Nicole Williams, a spokeswoman for Tubbs Jones, said another lawmaker requested the money but Tubbs Jones supported it. With a deficit in Cleveland's public school system and music education among the programs getting cut, the museum aid could benefit the city as a whole, Williams said.
Alaska Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Ted Stevens claimed credit for channeling federal money to the state's salmon industry, including money to research use of salmon as a base for baby food.
"The goal is to increase the market for salmon by encouraging the production of more `value-added' salmon products," Murkowski's office said.
Michigan's two Democratic senators, Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow, let it be known they had won $4 million for an environmentally friendly public transportation system in Traverse City.
Many of the special items that made the cut were promoted by lobbyists hired by interest groups, companies or communities to convince lawmakers money was needed for their projects.
"No, a bike trail in X, Y, Z part of the country doesn't benefit the country as a whole, but the people in that district or community (also) put their money into the pot," said Jim Albertine, a lobbyist who successfully pressed for research and development money for the superconductor industry.
The targeted spending was so prolific that McCain had no problem filling a half-hour speech with examples. The shrimp program really stuck in his craw.
"I am hoping that the appropriators could explain to me why we need $1 million for this - are American shrimp unruly and lacking initiative?" he asked.
McCain's query went unanswered, in part because spending documents don't identify who proposed each item or why.
11/24/04 02:50 EST
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.