Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
If Malkin thinks Hillary can win in 2008 on the basis of immigration alone, then she's as vacuous as her critics contend. Nobody with any sense believes this.

First of all, Malkin said the GOP should be very concerned about Hillary on the basis of her staking out ground to the right of the GOP on immigration. I agree with her.

On Hannity and Colmes tonight, Laura Ingraham made the same point and Sean Hannity as well as Democrat Pat Cadell both agreed 100%. I suppose to you that makes them vacuous or having no sense as well.

But what do Malkin, Hannity, Ingraham and Cadell know? After all, if they were so smart they'd be spending a bulk of their time posting on internet forums! (/sarcasm)

128 posted on 11/23/2004 7:56:54 PM PST by CrosscutSaw (God is sovereign -- Jesus is Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: CrosscutSaw

I think Hannity and Ingraham realize the importance of nominating a REAL conservative in 2008, rather than a RINO, because of issues like this. Hillary is cunning, and she will trample over a RINO with no principles, running to his right on some issues. I also wouldn't put it past her and Bill to surreptitiously back a third-party conservative to draw votes from a RINO, like Perot did in 1992. (The Dems may have had George Soros in 2004, but the Clintons could have Mark Rich in 2008.)

I am confident, though, that Laura, Sean, and Rush will use their programs as forums to make sure that we nominate a REAL conservative, and keep Hillary out of office.


129 posted on 11/24/2004 12:04:44 AM PST by nj26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson