Caption Protester (Green Party Member Crashes "Nationals" Unveiling)

Yahoo! News (Reuters) ^ | 11/22/2004 | n/a

[Pyro7480]

ATTENTION EDITORS: REPEATING WITH ADDITIONAL CAPTION INFORMATION - Adam Eidinger, a protestor against funding for a new baseball stadium in Washington, is grabbed by team officials before a ceremony unveiling the new Washington DC Major League Baseball team logo and name for the 'Washington Nationals' in the Union Station, November 22, 2004. The Nationals moniker has served two other Washington franchises during the 1800's and during the first-half of the 20th Century. Eidinger, who is not opposed to having a team in Washington, is against public financing to build the stadium. REUTERS/Larry Downing

[Pyro7480]

Brawling in sports is contagious... even when the team hasn't even moved yet!

[nhoward14]

WOW! Bono sure has let himself go since the election!

[Luddite Patent Counsel]

"They should be called the MULTINATIONALS, dammit! And all ump's calls should be subject to a global test!"

[Peace will be here soon]

"Eidinger, who is not opposed to having a team in Washington, is against public financing to build the stadium."


Too funny. If they didn`t build the stadium for this team , they wouldn`t have moved the team there.... This team is owned by MLB !! They no doubt have the money to build their own stadium but why would they do that? Washington got their baseball team, but they had to pay for it somehow. I guess they should have just got the team for free......

[BigLittle]

[BellStar]

Eidinger, who is not opposed to having a team in Washington, is against public financing to build the stadium.

This is a good guy! I agree.

[Luddite Patent Counsel]

"Jack, stop telling people you're Ozzy Osbourne's son to get into places, you're a f****** loser!"

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

UNNNGH!

[rmmcdaniell]

Too funny. If they didn`t build the stadium for this team , they wouldn`t have moved the team there.... This team is owned by MLB !! They no doubt have the money to build their own stadium but why would they do that? Washington got their baseball team, but they had to pay for it somehow. I guess they should have just got the team for free......

Its bad enough taxpayers have to subsidize the welfare state. Its completely disgusting and morally offensive that taxpayers have to fund somebody else's entertainment.

[Pyro7480]

UNNNGH!

We have a winner!

[Luddite Patent Counsel]

Taxpayers don't "have to" subsidize any of this. Campaign against it, vote against it, and if it doesn't go your way, move.

[O.C. - Old Cracker]

WOW! Bono sure has let himself go since the election!

And he's switched out his blue tinted goggles for clear.

[Darksheare]

Yup!
Winner caption is UNNNGH!

[Peace will be here soon]

"Its completely disgusting and morally offensive that taxpayers have to fund somebody else's entertainment."

Yep, and Washington got the worst enterprise to deal with. The owners ( Major League Baseball ) don`t care if this team wins or losses. As long as it makes money. They will get an All-Star game very soon though, you can bet on that.

[albee]

He looks like Michael Moore's skinny brother.

[marmar]

That's no protester.......that's michael moore....

[GeronL]

"I am a Nerd. We demand Nerd rights. We here, we nerds, get used to it"

[SpyGuy]

"Can you hear me now? Good!"

(That's who he looks like to me)

[KoRn]

Phreak. Is it just me, or do liberals TRY to be ugly or weird looking?

[Pyro7480]

I think a person's overall agenda often reflects the state of their minds/souls. Consequently, their appearance will often become unkept too. However, I think the more dangerous ones are the ones who blend in and/or remain hidden.