Replies

The good doctor is too hung up on the term "human being"

The good doctor is not hung up on the term "human being" Like me the doctor is hung up on how good men can not read simple English. The Declaration of Independence is vary simple and vary clear in the establishment of our inalienable rights. The Declaration forms the government and set forth it's limitations. The foremost being it can not violate the inalienable rights. It also provides a remedy if the government does, and that is the right for the populace to abolish the government and start anew.

The problem here is we have let those in power get away with silly acts like righting a 400 word document just to say no and to search for the meaning of the word "is". The enactment of so many and so complex and convoluted laws that the citizens of this country have no clear meaning of right and wrong.

The original intent was for us to have vary few yet strict laws and those laws were to be interpreted vary liberally.

What the 1973 court did was dehumanize the entire of the unborn in the human species. This, just to make it easy to then grant an evil right to hire these human beings killed at the whim of a pregnant woman. And how was this specious 'right' served to the American 'palate'? In an unspoken agreement that a woman has a right to self defense. Oh, to be sure, the way to say that has many many forms, but they all come down to protecting a woman's right of self defense. So, if the unborn are innocent alive human beings, how is it that they do not have the same inalienable right that the pregnant woman has? And in fighting to save them, are we engaging in the defense of those tiny selves? Is there a way to reconcile this schizophrenic situation?... I believe there is, by openly admitting first that abortion has some foundation in a woman's right to protect her life ... but that ought not mean a killing is warranted for another innocent human being, unless of course Blackburn, et al are allowed to once again establish 'the law of the land'.