Life begins at conceptionNOT birth. Birth is one day in the life of a person who is already nine months old. |
i must admit i like this 2 murders from the peterson case.
as soon as this sinks in, you're going to hear a lotta screaming from the radical feminists!
It is not a CHOICE,
It is a CHILD!
You know, every time I hear Kerry in the campaign say that the Dems want ot be the "science party"..which statement was an implicit jibe against people of faith, I was comforted by the fact that SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY, like the 3D ultrsound, is actually reaffirming what we believe.
The article covers why NARAL and NOW would be against such laws, simply because it blows their arguments about "choice". But it's also why liberal Dems in Congress oppose all kinds of reasonable legislation that protects the unborn. If a fetus is a child at nine months, then why not eight? And if eight, why not seven and so forth.
IMHO...
If the Republican Party would take the Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice question out of the party platform, GW Bush would have won by an enormous margin.
The majority of people I know who vote DemoRat do so because they are Pro-Choice.
Yes, I know what you are going to say - but that's the truth as well.
PS... wouldn't it be nice if
A) People (both Male and Female) took responsibility for birth control?
B) everyone valued life enough that there was no need for abortions?
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
AN UNBORN CHILD IS A HUMAN BEING REGARDLESS IF THE CHILD IS WANTED OR NOT, OR WANTED DEAD OR NOT AND REGARDLESS WHO KILLS THE CHILD, A PHYSICIAN OR AN IRATE HUSBAND.
State Unborn Victim Laws a summary of the laws of the 30 states that recognize the unlawful killing of an unborn child as homicide in at least some circumstances. The federal Unborn Victims of Violence Act, enacted April 1, 2004, covers unborn victims of federal and military crimes.
stemcellresearch.org - Founding Statement
CBHD: On Human Embryos and Stem Cell Research
It may strike some as surprising that legal protection of embryonic human beings can co-exist with the U.S. Supreme Court's 1973 legalization of abortion.29 However, the Supreme Court has never prevented the government from protecting prenatal life outside the abortion context,30 and public sentiment also seems even more opposed to government funding of embryo experimentation than to the funding of abortion.31 The laws of a number of states-including Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Utah-specifically protect embryonic human beings outside the womb. Most of these provisions prohibit experiments on embryos outside the womb.32
In FT January 2003: Constitutional Persons, Robert H. Bork stated,"Science and rational demonstration prove that a human exists from the moment of conception." This objective fact refutes any wishful subjective speculation stating otherwise!
At most, it is evidence of the mindset of the Founding Fathers, but none of its statements carry any import in terms of law or legal significance.
Jer 1:5
How sad is it that the Supreme Court has "discovered" via the penumbras of the Constitution, a "right" to kill unborn children, engage in homosexual sodomy, discrimate in a law school/college admissions based on race of the applicant- yet cannot read the simple, straightforward 2d Amendment: "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" -14 WORDS!- as rendering per se unconstitutional such drivel as the Assault Weapons ban, Brady Bill, D.C. & NYC handgun laws, etc.
O'Connor, Ginsberg, Souter, and Stevens aren't fit to carry Alexander Hamilton's judicial jock-strap. I've seen more rational decisions made by Ouija Boards than these 4 hacks. Please, Bush, replace these 4 clowns ASAP.
And as for you, Mr. Arlen "Q-Tip Head" Specter, please join your spineless loser pal Jumpin' Jimmy Jeffords on the D side of the aisle, you ungrateful Keystone State disgrace.
You have to admire the absolute stupidity of the pro-abortion Leftist scum on this point. After all, if a fetus isn't alive, there's not much reason to abort it.
Ping for life!
In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court has not declared when a human being is a human being.
Instead, the Supreme Court decided, for all practical purposes, to grant pregnant American women the ancient Roman right of Patria Potestas over their own unborn children.
A Roman father had the legal right under Patria Potesta to put his own child, of whatever age, to death. If someone other than the father did so, the killer was guilty of murder.
In Roman times, a father exercising his power of life and death over his own children under Patria Potestas acknowledged and understood perfectly well that he was taking a human life as was his right under Roman law. The modern American woman, on the other hand, would prefer to pretend otherwise. It makes her Inner Child feel better about it.
I think the Dred Scott case is prophetically relevant after the Scott Peterson trial conviction.
The good doctor is too hung up on the term "human being" - it's lawful to kill a fully grown human being under certain circumstances - a fact which anyone who carries a defensive firearm is well aware.
The question of whether a fetus is a "human being" is only tangentially related to the legal issues regarding how and when it is killed.
"Life begins at conceptionNOT birth.
Birth is one day in the life of a person who is already nine months old."
[already nine months old.] Sometimes less than nine months and sometimes more than nine months.
...But I understand your point!
And I believe it to be true...Life begins at conception.
.
BTTT
ProLife Ping!
If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
Special PING V!