Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnnyZ; fieldmarshaldj; Kuksool; Clintonfatigued; Dan from Michigan; Coop; Impy; LdSentinal; ...

Here's the list of the 100 fastest-growing counties from April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2003 (the last date for which the Census Bureau has an estimate): http://www.census.gov/popest/counties/CO-EST2003-09.html

I wanted to see which were the 3 counties that were among the 100 fastest growing but which voted for Senator Kerry over President Bush, and I must say that the answer makes it even more apparent that the GOP owns the exurbs. The 3 fastest-growing Kerry counties were:

Clark County, NV (#53 on the list): Clark County gave Kerry 51.7% of the vote, largely due to the fact that Las Vegas and some of its inner-ring suburbs (such as heavily black North Las Vegas) are in Clark County, but the fast-growing parts of the county vote Republican. If Clark County was split into three or four normal-sized counties instead of being a county that comprises 70% of Nevada's total population, only the inner-city county would have voted for Kerry.

Nantucket County, MA (#86 on the list): Nantucket County made the list because its small population grew by 1,204 people in the 3+ years in question, from 9,520 to 10,724. It is by no means an exurban county, and its growth comes from an increase in wealthy resort denizens who have chosen to make their "cottages" their primary home.

Chatham County, NC (#100 on the list): Chatham County is the only true exurban county carried by Kerry among the 100 fastest growing, but it is the exception that proves the rule, since (i) it barely made the list of the fastest-growing counties, (ii) a large chunk of its population growth came from Hispanic immigrants who moved there to work in the poultry industry, and most of them are not U.S. citizens and thus unable to vote, and (iii) Kerry's unofficial winning margin in the county was 5 votes, and it is quite possible that when they add all of the absentee votes to the official numbers it will turn out that President Bush actually carried the county in 2004.

So stating that in 2004 President Bush carried 97 of the 100 fastest-growing counties in America actually underestimates President Bush's dominance in fast-growing communities.


45 posted on 11/29/2004 2:36:36 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AuH2ORepublican

That is really good news. We should add the the Hispanic populations moving in that are not citizens and not allowed to vote, but may do so illegally. Ask Bob Doran about illegals voting...


46 posted on 11/29/2004 4:04:52 PM PST by Abram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Well, after the 2010 census, the red states may pick up 10+_ EV's from the blues after reapportionment..


47 posted on 11/29/2004 4:46:21 PM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: AuH2ORepublican
Bush won the fastest growing county in MI too(Livingston). I'm surprised it didn't make the top 100 list.

Chatham went to Gore as well. It's 17% black and about 10% Latino. (As of 2000)

Clark is 20% Latino and 9% black overall. (37% and 19% in North LV, 23% and 10% in Vegas itself)

49 posted on 11/29/2004 7:21:36 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("now we got this guy in the Oval office who don't take no sh*t from no gimpy little countries!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson