Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What happened in Santiago?
Powerline Blog ^ | 11/21/2004 | Powerline

Posted on 11/21/2004 9:16:29 PM PST by waterman478

What happened in Santiago?

Dafydd ab Hugh writes:

Judging from your comments, I don't think you guys realize the seriousness of what happened in Chile. Let me put it into perspective: the president has been marked for death by hundreds of terrorist groups; he is in a foreign country, one where there have been near contintuous riots against America and against him, personally, over the Iraq War; as he's walking into a banquet hall, the local police intentionally cut him off from his security detail.

If the first thought that popped into your mind when you heard about that was not "assassination," then your mind is still laboring in a pre-9/11 world.

It's entirely possible that rather than "rescuing" his detained Secret Service detail, Bush in fact saved his own life. If there was a plan, if this wasn't just a random act of rudeness by the Chilean police (why would they do that?), then Bush's quick thinking may have forced the would-be attackers to abort the operation.

This little incident needs a thorough and complete investigation by Chile, as well as by the CIA. The incident the next day -- where the Bush team demanded everyone at the next banquet pass through metal detectors -- shows that they had the same thought I did (and we all should have had); the fact that Chile refused, even to the point of scuttling the party, is troubling, to say the least.

(Excerpt) Read more at powerlineblog.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: speculation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: BurbankKarl

Actually, it was the Lagos President and his guests who refused to go through metal detectors, which is all you need to know.

All I have to say is there are two groups I would have chained to chairs in dark rooms awaiting some rigorous Q&A: The Lagos "guests", and the Chilean cops who tried to stop the President's agent.


21 posted on 11/21/2004 10:48:22 PM PST by waterman478
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lainde
And why was there only ONE SS there?

I'm not sure what you mean by 'there', because Bush had more than one SS agent accompanying him into the building.

This thread from Saturday goes into a lot of detail:

Bush comes to aid of Secret Service agent
Posted by wjersey
On News/Activism 11/20/2004 7:13:02 PM EST · 1,318 replies · 67,028+ views
22 posted on 11/21/2004 11:21:18 PM PST by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

Yeah but nobody wants to kill Bill Clinton - (The terroristd' friend)


23 posted on 11/22/2004 12:06:30 AM PST by wildcatf4f3 (out of the sun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wildcatf4f3

Why in the world would anyone want to kill Bill Clinton? Every terrorist in the world loves him. The enabler of 911 that caused the deaths of thousands of American innocents and military personnel endears Bill Clinton to the terrorst scum.


24 posted on 11/22/2004 12:30:16 AM PST by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: waterman478

I take my cues from the President.

He did not look like HE felt threatened during the altercation on Saturday, or during any of the events yesterday. In fact, he looks as though he was having a grand old time.

I know Freepers love to escalate things in dramatic ways, but we are not omniscient security experts even though we have internet access and Free Republic logon privileges.


25 posted on 11/22/2004 12:33:51 AM PST by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waterman478

If true, it shows how stupid the terrorists are because the next move on the chessboard would be President Cheney, Vice President Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense Wolfowitz and a bright green glow where most of the Middle East used to be.


26 posted on 11/22/2004 12:44:15 AM PST by Moonman62 (Federal Creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waterman478
Right. And Lee Harvey Oswald didn't act alone.

OK, well maybe that's a bad example, but this powerblog thing is strictly tinfoil hat stuff.

27 posted on 11/22/2004 1:59:03 AM PST by tjg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tjg
It was no conspiracy nor attempt on the President's life.

It was a "face" issue.

Like many inferior cultures (see Islam, several home grown sub-cultures) the Chilean's typical foreign contempt for Bush was augmented by a) their anger at American Hubris - that one man was so important as to warrant all that security. b) The insinuation by default that all of that security brought with the President BY the President meant that THEY were incapable of protecting him (Oh yeah! We'll show you Mr. fancy SS guy & arrogant Bush!).

Its that simple.

28 posted on 11/22/2004 2:29:55 AM PST by NJ Neocon (Democracy is tyranny of the masses. It is three wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NJ Neocon
Oops...left out one part...lets try that again.

Ahem...

It was no conspiracy nor attempt on the President's life. Like many inferior cultures (see Islam, several home grown sub-cultures) the Chilean's were "Dissed"!

Their typical foreign contempt (as in most nations's) for Bush was augmented by a) their anger at American Hubris - that one man was so important as to warrant all that security. b) The insinuation by default that all of that security brought with the President BY the President meant that THEY were incapable of protecting him (Oh yeah! We'll show you Mr. fancy SS guy & arrogant Bush!). Its that simple.

29 posted on 11/22/2004 2:33:01 AM PST by NJ Neocon (Democracy is tyranny of the masses. It is three wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: waterman478

IMO, the Chileans are currying favor with "old Europe" by doing this.

It was intended to humiliate Bush.


30 posted on 11/22/2004 2:34:52 AM PST by DustyMoment (Repeal CFR NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waterman478

What I don't get is why this wasn't intimately choreographed beforehand - concerning the security detail. I seriously doubt that Lagos told Bush "Hey why doncha come to my place for dinner...say around 5-ish?" and that Team Bush said "Okeedokee, we'll be there, and probably take a cab." What the sam hill is going on here? Either the Embassy or Secret Service didn't do its job, or the Chileans tried to pull a fast one. Does anybody have any insight as to how a colossal f-up like this could have occurred?


31 posted on 11/22/2004 2:39:47 AM PST by guitfiddlist (When the 'Rats break out switchblades, it's no time to invoke Robert's Rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
It was intended to humiliate Bush.

Good point. I sure hope you're right, and not the crazy things that have been going through my head since I heard this yesterday. Still, I'll rest much easier when he's back here in the US.

32 posted on 11/22/2004 2:48:30 AM PST by Siouxz (Freepers are the best!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: lainde
I do believe the president is in God's hands...But

There are no "buts" in this equation. If God is who He says He is, and our President is under His care, W lives.

Now that being said... "Thou shall not tempt the Lord your God." by being foolish.

33 posted on 11/22/2004 3:12:21 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
What get me is the excuse of their being offended by going through metal detectors. That's routine security all of us have to submit to if we're going to get on an airline, enter a court room, or, especially, visit the President. Their resistance to doing that, combined with the fact that a lot of former Allende supporters are in this Chilean administration, tells me that somebody could have been planning an assassination and the SS did the absolutely right thing.
34 posted on 11/22/2004 6:29:15 AM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NJ Neocon

A face or turf issue. I think that's right. But I wouldn't relieve the SS of blame. They have a reputation for not being easy to work with.


35 posted on 11/22/2004 9:46:58 AM PST by tjg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson