I'm actually surprised that the New York Slimes was willing to run a story that exposes the criminal enterprises of one of their "favorites."
1 posted on
11/21/2004 5:34:04 PM PST by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
Just google Sotheby's scandals and you will find out they have done this before with different art.
2 posted on
11/21/2004 5:40:09 PM PST by
Ginifer
To: wagglebee
I'm as surprised as you are. Surprised the Times didn't somehow link the stolen art to Halliburton.
4 posted on
11/21/2004 5:47:02 PM PST by
Read2Know
To: wagglebee
"It was a wildly lucrative business, and one built on the backs of poorly paid, landless farm workers. "
Are there any farm workers who are well paid?
Is the NYT a "wildly lucrative business"?
5 posted on
11/21/2004 6:16:48 PM PST by
DUMBGRUNT
(Sane, and have the papers/journal to prove it!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson