Skip to comments.
Jobs rotate in rumor mill Lieberman key to possible changes [Joe: Homeland Security Secty?]
News-Times [Danbury CT] ^
| Nov 21, 2004
| Fred Lucas
Posted on 11/21/2004 8:52:02 AM PST by Mike Fieschko
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: Mike Fieschko
Damn fine strategery if its true. I can't wait to see the Dims go insane if they lose another Senate seat.
2
posted on
11/21/2004 8:57:08 AM PST
by
trek
To: Mike Fieschko
Ahem...isn't Ann Coulter from Connecticut?
3
posted on
11/21/2004 8:58:07 AM PST
by
cloud8
To: Mike Fieschko
Johnson gets an 'F' from GOA and a 47 life time rating from ACU. Not exactly "one of us."
4
posted on
11/21/2004 8:59:24 AM PST
by
donozark
(UMA PEMMARAJU HAS HER EYE(S) ON ME!)
To: Mike Fieschko
Lieberman is a good man, BUT campaigned for Kerry several times in Florida AND, mostly, he was the Democrat VP candidate in 2000! I really don't know if it is a good choice for President Bush and the Cabinet. First of all, Mineta must resign and I'd have liked men as Zell Miller with Bush!
To: Mike Fieschko
Lieberman would be a masterful choice as Homeland Defense Secretary!
6
posted on
11/21/2004 9:00:52 AM PST
by
zzen01
To: donozark
She may be the best chance you get for an "R" in Connecticut.
ONe this is...it would get us one vote closer to 60 in the Senate...which is why I don't think Lieberman will go for it...
7
posted on
11/21/2004 9:01:34 AM PST
by
Keith
(NOW, MORE THAN EVER....IT'S ABOUT THE JUDGES!)
To: Mike Fieschko
Lieberman for Homeland Security??? What on earth for? First, what are his qualifications (slim or none) and second, if he is one of the more conservative democRATs in the Senate, why give a blue state the opportunity to replace him with a Kennedy / Hillary clone?
8
posted on
11/21/2004 9:02:20 AM PST
by
NonValueAdded
("We are in the process of allowing them to self-actualise" LtC. Rainey, Fallujah, 11/04)
To: Keith
I don't think so. Lieberman is a conservative democrat (more or less) and he would not filibuster in any case. Besides we would probably lose a post in the House. The problems are many!
To: trek
And don't forget Nelson from Nebraska for Secretary of Agriculture. That would make +2 for the GOP.
And it's just fine now for a Governor to fill a vacant opposition seat with someone from their own party, after what the Democrats did in Georgia with Zell Miller.
It's not our fault that Zell did them more harm than good...
;-)
10
posted on
11/21/2004 9:03:32 AM PST
by
counterpunch
(The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
To: cloud8
YA! There ya go! Wouldn't THAT antagonize lefties! SENATOR ANN COULTER! Poor Alan Combs, he would jacktitate like a squirrel on a high-tension line...
11
posted on
11/21/2004 9:04:16 AM PST
by
donozark
(UMA PEMMARAJU HAS HER EYE(S) ON ME!)
To: Keith
True. But would she be there for us on key votes?
12
posted on
11/21/2004 9:06:04 AM PST
by
donozark
(UMA PEMMARAJU HAS HER EYE(S) ON ME!)
To: counterpunch
Are you dreaming or kidding? I don't wont too many rats in the next Bush Cabinet!!! Expecially these rats, who would not filibuster.
To: NonValueAdded
Lieberman for Homeland Security??? What on earth for? First, what are his qualifications (slim or none)
What are Tom Ridge's qualifications?
What, if any, is even the purpose of the Department of Homeland Security?
It was Lieberman's idea... maybe he'd know what to do with it.
14
posted on
11/21/2004 9:06:55 AM PST
by
counterpunch
(The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
To: Mike Fieschko
Huh. I don't see legislators as making good department heads. So Lieberman isn't a great pick. Nancy Johnson's a RINO... Its kind of an everybody sorta wins but sorta loses scenario. But it just about is plausible... Demonrats DeLauro and Larson are extremists, so Rell would have grounds for preomoting a Republican.
15
posted on
11/21/2004 9:07:01 AM PST
by
dangus
To: donozark
Johnson gets an 'F' from GOA and a 47 life time rating from ACU. Not exactly "one of us." More reason to do it. She is next in line for the House Ways and Means Committee chairmanship.
16
posted on
11/21/2004 9:07:14 AM PST
by
John Thornton
("Appeasers always hope that the crocodile will eat them last." Winston Churchill)
To: Mike Fieschko; All
Hubby suggested that Bush nominate Lieberman to the Supreme Court. I'm not sure if he heard that somewhere or just came up with it on his own.
Any comments?
17
posted on
11/21/2004 9:09:48 AM PST
by
jocon307
(Jihad is world wide. Jihad is serious business. We ignore global jihad at our peril.)
To: Mike Fieschko
I don't think any of this will happen. Even though I think out of all the contenders Lieberman would have been the toughest Dem for Bush to beat in the 2004 election.
I also think that even though Lieberman campaigned for Kerry... when he got in that voting booth he pushed Bush.
18
posted on
11/21/2004 9:11:24 AM PST
by
trashcanbred
(Anti-social and anti-socialist)
To: jocon307
Hubby suggested that Bush nominate Lieberman to the Supreme Court. I'm not sure if he heard that somewhere or just came up with it on his own. Any comments? SIMPLY NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
To: NonValueAdded
A DINO is still a DIMO (not an error in spelling;)
Remember him and Gore. ::shudder::
20
posted on
11/21/2004 9:13:09 AM PST
by
stopem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson