Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Betaille; Ciexyz; Hildy
They are going to lose a fortune on this movie.

They sure are. It cost $160 million and I'm pretty sure it's gonna bomb. So sad, too. I was really looking forward to seeing an Alexander movie someday (I've had a long fascination with Alexander the Great's conquests, since a project I did in 7th grade).

That blond, simpering version of Colin Farrell just looks so silly though I won't be going to see it. I'll probably rent the DVD someday, and that's it. I know Alexander was blond, but if they had to cast Farrell they should've just taken some license and left his hair dark. Or, they could've just cast a blond actor or whatever.

Not that the other Alexander adaptation that would've starred Leonardo DiCaprio would've been much better from the sound of it. *sigh*

16 posted on 11/20/2004 8:38:36 PM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: AntiGuv
Not that the other Alexander adaptation that would've starred Leonardo DiCaprio would've been much better from the sound of it. *sigh*

Yeah, at least Stone's version has a man playing Alexander, as opposed to a girl who's somehow managed to pass herself off as a guy for a decade or so.
76 posted on 11/21/2004 6:32:30 AM PST by Xenalyte (Leonardo DiCaprio is a girl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson