The judges, congress, the President, law enforcement, mayors, they are all innocent, and have nothing to do with this epic lawlessness. Yet if you fail to pay your taxes, to pay for this epic lawlessness, you can be damn sure, they are coming after *you* with force. Joe, it's interesting to note that many of the posters defending this out of control judge are the same ones that support and defend our government's open borders agenda and all the lawlessness, crime, fraud, and mayhem associated with it. Apparently Party affiliation trumps all common sense and sense of fairness.
Joe, it's interesting to note that many of the posters defending this out of control judge are the same ones that support and defend our government's open borders agenda and all the lawlessness, crime, fraud, and mayhem associated with it. Apparently Party affiliation trumps all common sense and sense of fairness.
Nice straw man. Too bad it won't stand up on its own.
To help it stand, you'll have to cite examples of the "many of the posters" that take these conflicting positions. If you're right, it should be easy to do.
You also shouldn't confuse "supporting an out-of-control judge" with "in the absence of more information, siding with a judge over a confirmed drug-abusing scofflaw".
Besides, as was mentioned previously in
post 234 AND the article, she was serving the 21 days at the same time as the 45 days for the drug charge. So, in essence, he went easy on her, because if he REALLY wanted to be a jerk, he could have ordered her to serve it consecutively.