Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Utmost Certainty
And you saying that, "she didn't want to miss a call from her crack dealer..." just underlines my point.

That was intended as humor

What's your excuse for NOT READING the article your making ignorant comments about?

144 posted on 11/20/2004 11:51:47 AM PST by Mister Baredog ((DO IT NOW, if you haven't put up a flag on your FR homepage yet,PLEASE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: Mister Baredog

I read the article.

What I meant was that giving her 21 days for a cell phone going off isn't a way to "teach someone to straighten up their life." She was in court, facing a drug charge.

The punishment she recieved should have been solely limited to the verdict (45 days) the judge rendered on that said drug charge. The additional 21 days was out of context of the crime itself.

That clear enough for you?


154 posted on 11/20/2004 11:57:03 AM PST by Utmost Certainty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson