Colonization of lagging countries led, via forced (or through WTO, IMF, WORLD BANK) integration, to the loss of manufactures, a shrinking comparative advantage in primary production, and the displacement of indigenous capital, skills and enterprises.
Nope, doesn't sound like Smith to me. Unless you are claming that the "colonizing" countries in your example are monopolizing the "colony's" product, thereby holding the "colony" back?