Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arkie2
This article looked cool, till I read this part on page 2:

"(the blast had nothing to do with fusion; hydrogen mixed with oxygen, creating the equivalent of rocket fuel)."

I didn't know water was explosive, and it would make a pretty heavy rocket fuel.

18 posted on 11/20/2004 6:07:37 AM PST by Oblongata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Oblongata

LOL!


21 posted on 11/20/2004 6:13:11 AM PST by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Oblongata
No doubt, you are feigning ignorance here, in order to make a joke... ;-}

It is the exothermic chemical combination reaction of hydrogen with oxygen to form water that releases copious amounts of energy. Of course, water (the reaction product) is not a fuel. It is the remains ('ash') of an exothermic reaction that has already occurred.

Of course, the (mis) use of the word, "creating" in the sentence to which you responded is ludicrously funny:

"(the blast had nothing to do with fusion; hydrogen mixed with oxygen, creating the equivalent of rocket fuel)."

The ignorant reporter should have used "acting as" instead of "creating"...

And of course, using "mixed with" instead of "reacted with" makes the reporter's sentence even more misleading...

Where do they get those ignoramuses who call themselves "reporters"? :-(


67 posted on 11/20/2004 1:44:34 PM PST by TXnMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson