Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tension rises as China scours the globe for energy
The Telegraph ^ | 19/11/2004 | Richard Spencer

Posted on 11/19/2004 7:34:07 PM PST by demlosers

China's insatiable demand for energy is prompting fears of financial and diplomatic collisions around the globe as it seeks reliable supplies of oil from as far away as Brazil and Sudan.

An intrusion into Japanese territorial waters by a Chinese nuclear submarine last week and a trade deal with Brazil are the latest apparently unconnected consequences of China's soaring economic growth.

The connection, however, lies in an order issued last year by President Hu Jintao to seek secure oil supplies abroad – preferably ones which could not be stopped by America in case of conflict over Taiwan.

The submarine incident was put down to a "technical error" by the Chinese government, which apologised to Japan.

But even before the incident the People's Daily, the government mouthpiece, had commented that competition over the East China Sea between the two countries was "only a prelude of the game between China and Japan in the arena of international energy".

The Brazil trade deal included funding for a joint oil-drilling and pipeline programme at a cost that experts said would add up to three times the cost of simply buying oil on the market.

The West, however, has paid little attention to these developments. For the United States and Europe are far more concerned with the even more sensitive issues of China's relations with "pariah states".

In September, China threatened to veto any move to impose sanctions on Sudan over the atrocities in Darfur. It has invested $3 billion in the African country's oil industry, which supplies it with seven per cent of its needs.

Then, this month, it said that it opposed moves to refer Iran's nuclear stand-off with the International Atomic Energy Agency to the United Nations Security Council.

A week before, China's second biggest state oil firm had signed a $70 billion deal for oilfield and natural gas development with Iran, which already supplies 13 per cent of China's needs.

China has its own reserves of oil and natural gas and once was a net oil exporter. But as its economy has expanded by an average of nine per cent per year for the last two decades, so has its demand for energy.

This year it overtook Japan as the world's second largest consumer of energy, behind the US.

Its projected demand, boosted by a huge rise in car ownership as well as the need to find alternatives to polluting coal for electricity generation, has contributed to the surge in the price of oil this year. Shortages are already leading to power cuts in the big cities.

Since President Hu ordered state-owned oil firms to "go abroad" to ensure supply, they have begun drilling for gas in the East China Sea, just west of the line that Japan regards as its border.

Japan protested, to no avail, that the project should be a joint one.

The two are also set to clash over Russia's oil wealth. China is furious that Japan has outbid it in their battle to determine the route of the pipeline that Russia intends to build to the Far East.

Japan favoured a route to the sea, enabling oil to be shipped to both Japan and China. China wanted an overland route through its own territory, which would give it ultimate control if hostilities broke out.

Increasingly, analysts are saying that China's efforts have gone beyond what is safe or even in its own interests.

Claude Mandil, the executive director of the International Energy Agency in Paris, said the reserves in the East China Sea were hardly worth the trouble.

"Nobody thinks that there will be a lot of oil and gas in this part of the world," he said.

"It may be a difficult political issue but I don't think the energy content is worthwhile."

Eurasia Group, a New York-based firm of political analysts, said its oil experts worked out that China was paying such an inflated price for its investment in Brazil that the cost for the oil it ended up with was three times the market price.

"If China's economy falters, which, in my view, appears increasingly likely, then commodity prices will plummet, and with them, the value of the assets that produce them," Jason Kindopp, Eurasia's lead China analyst, said.

"Beijing may end up in a early 1990s Japan situation, where it is forced to sell recently purchased overseas assets for a fraction of what it paid for them."

China's wider aggression to secure oil and gas was the greatest threat to its international standing in the next decade.

"Sudan is the primary example," he said.

"It marks the first time in recent years that China has promised to wield its veto power in the UN Security Council against a petition initiated by the United States and backed by France and Great Britain."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: anwr; china; energy; mexico; napalminthemorning; opec; sudan; venezuela; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: demlosers

BTTT


61 posted on 11/20/2004 1:29:31 PM PST by hattend (Where'd my tagline go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell

Nuclear power plants are definitely part of the solution if countries don't use technology that generates atom bombs as a side line and if they are advanced enough to build and run them without Chernobles happening.


62 posted on 11/20/2004 6:48:23 PM PST by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Battle Axe
That's what God did and that is how we got oil in the first place.

Actually there's an interesting theory that He might have done something else.

Coal is from plant life, but planets are often formed with lots of hydrocarbons in the mix in the first place. Oil may be part of the ancient natural layers of the Earth before life began and seeps up at tectonic plate fracture lines.

63 posted on 11/20/2004 6:52:50 PM PST by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
Gotta get that energy somewhere to make all that crap that Walmart sells

No kidding. I kept picking up and putting things down at Walmart today because of Made in China on the back. I think my outdoor string of lights is just going to have to do without orange and white bulbs this Christmas.

My eyesight wasn't good enough to check where the movies I bought for the troops were made.

64 posted on 11/20/2004 6:56:57 PM PST by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Tom Clancy "The Bear and the Dragon" Bump.


65 posted on 11/20/2004 6:59:20 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spinestein

this was apologized too

The Sinking of Panay, 12 December 1937

http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/ships/dafs/PR/pr5-sinking.html

http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/ships/PR/PR-5_Panay.html

http://home.sandiego.edu/~pbugler/


66 posted on 11/20/2004 11:59:50 PM PST by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael

China is the gathering threat. They understand the Soviet system of economic isolation did not work and they are hoodwinking the world into thinking that the country is moving toward reform by allowing foreign brick & mortor investments. In reality, it is still hard communists pulling the strings and oppressing the people - they are sure not to have CNN televise it like they sis Tienemen Square.

The two most important allies in that we will have to stand by in the coming years are Israel and Taiwan. One is starting down the barrel of a terrorist gun, the other down the barrel of a communist gun. Both are security threats to the US.


67 posted on 11/21/2004 4:57:50 AM PST by Reagan Disciple (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Disciple

I agree, The communist party embraced capitalism to survive. Our continue support of this policy, has brough freedom to the chinese people, although not completly I think we could not have come up with a better one.


68 posted on 11/21/2004 5:01:37 AM PST by Haro_546 (Christian Zionist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Where is this article?


69 posted on 11/21/2004 5:15:58 AM PST by opocno (France, the other dead meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth

That's the shame of it all. God provides us an answer to our problems, and man finds a way to turn the cure into a killer.


70 posted on 11/21/2004 7:00:43 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Specter promises not to block Bush appointees, yippee! but will he nuke barriers erected by JC Dems?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Coal-to-liquid solution for energy woes
The StraitsTimes ^ | July 19, 2004 | David Dapice
Posted on 07/20/2004 9:27:15 AM PDT by Baby Bear
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1174878/posts


71 posted on 11/21/2004 6:52:52 PM PST by SunkenCiv ("All I have seen teaches me trust the Creator for all I have not seen." -- Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
"The benefit is that over a billion people in China get a chance to live a better life. That's what capitalism is all about."



There are now over 1.4 billion people in China and as the country shifts from 3rd world to 1st their birthrate goes down. In the modernized parts of the country they have stopped having as many children (and this is independent of the mandatory abortions) while in the backwater areas the birthrate remains high.

Their new free markets and emerging freedoms are not illusions. The Chinese government knows that if they do not continue to relax their infringement of the citizens' liberties and continue to allow more access to private property and ownership of business and accumulation of wealth (slow though these reforms may be)then they are afraid that they will be dragged out of their palaces and strung up by those 1.4 billion people.

Just this year, the Chinese government changed their communist constitution and they now allow private ownership of business with the owner allowed to keep the profits. You might think "big deal" but I will bet that within the next decade China is a genuine capitalist democracy with an elected government accountable to the people, who would rather trade with the rest of the world than have wars with them.
72 posted on 11/21/2004 9:15:22 PM PST by spinestein (Trade liberty for security. Lose both. Deserve neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson