Posted on 11/19/2004 6:50:57 PM PST by saquin
MARK WINEGARDNER was a professor of creative writing with two well-reviewed novels and a book of short stories to his name when he received an offer he could not refuse.
A respected New York publishing house invited him to enter a competition to write a sequel to Mario Puzos classic novel The Godfather.
When I re-read The Godfather, I was not going to do it if I did not really have a view of where another novel could go. But I was just blown away by how many things were left on the table to investigate, Winegardner said yesterday.
The author, director of the creative writing department at Florida State University, became a literary made man when he was annointed Puzos successor on live television.
This week, hundreds of thousands of copies of his new book, The Godfather Returns, hit bookshops in the United States and 13 other countries, including Britain, where the title has been changed inexplicably to The Godfather: The Lost Years.
Hollywood is already abuzz with the possibility of a fourth Godfather film. There has been enormous early interest and there are a lot of conversations going on, so Im sure it will come to something, the author told The Times. Its the subject of frenetic conversations in Hollywood.
The new book is set between the end of Puzos original Godfather novel in 1955 and the opening of The Godfather, Part II film, which Puzo co-scripted with the director Francis Ford Coppola, along with the third film in the sequel, The Godfather, Part III.
Michael Corleone, aiming to make his family legitimate after a bloody war among New Yorks crime families, confronts his most dangerous rival yet, Fausto Dominick Nick Geraci Jr, a former boxer who worked as a Corleone street enforcer.
Winegardner argues that Michael Corleone, played by Al Pacino in the Coppola films, never had a worthy adversary until now. My character Nick Geraci is that, he said.
The competition for a sequel was the idea of Jonathan Karp, editorial director of Random House and Puzos editor for the last decade of his life. Puzo, a struggling writer who made his fortune with The Godfather at the age of 44, felt he could add no more to the saga before his death in 1999.
I understood why Mario never wanted to continue the story. It was bound to pale in comparison to the original. How do you improve on a legend? Mr Karp said. But one day on the phone, Mario did give me his blessing to revisit the Corleones.
Mr Karp, who refers to himself jokingly as Johnny the Pencil, set out to find a writer at roughly the same stage of his career as Puzo was when he wrote the book in 1969.
Winegardner, 42, admits he is not a Godfather cultist. But he had read Puzos original when he was 12 for the dirty parts and, by chance, received a boxed set of CDs of the Coppola films for Fathers Day, just before the competition was announced. For his two previous novels, he had met some low-level wise guys while researching organised crime in Cleveland, Ohio. For the book, he studied old FBI wiretaps and, unlike Puzo, visited Sicily, the Mafias original home.
So far, the book has met mixed reviews. The Associated Press suggested that it should sleep with the fishes and urged that the Corleones, the first family of American mob fiction, finally rest in peace.
Winegardner wants to avoid being pigeonholed as the Godfather writer, but does not rule out another volume.
There is a lot more story to fill, he said. The years from 1962 to 1979 are utterly uncovered by the saga. It would be hard for me to watch another writer fill them.
Life is too short.
Puzo was a great writer. And they are some great stories surrounding his life. Unfortunately, he'll be remembered for the Godfather, which is not his best work.
they = there
But Paulie wasn't sick. Remember, he was "sick" three days that month. Each time he was "sick" he got a phone call from the Tattaglias, apparently abortive hit attempts. That is how Sonny and Clemenza found him out.
And as for "worthy opponents" I liked Hyman Roth. I loved that mixture of paternal solicitude, feigned decrepitude, and steely ruthlessness.
Michael beat him because he had a soul and Roth didn't. Michael knew from the willingess of the Fidelista to die for his cause that these rebels were different. They couldn't be bought. You have to have a soul to understand that not everyone has a price. Soulless Roth was convinced that the Fidelistas were no different from Batista and would sell out just as they had.
I may be wrong, but I think your sequence is not correct.
No - that sequence is correct.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.