To: ambrose
It says he will be representing people who cast ballots on Nov. 2. What exactly is the claim then? They got to vote, did they not? This suit will be dismissed outright, with prejudice. As a 3d year law student I can say that this guy needs to go back to his first year of law school and get a clue. What a disgrace to the legal profession.
29 posted on
11/19/2004 8:37:07 PM PST by
Clump
To: All
I wouldn't be concerned about this side show. All they are trying to do is make noise. The very best they could do is raise enough stink that would throw it into the courts, where the OH legislature could choose the electors just like the FL legislature was getting ready to do.
It's my understanding the OH legislature is Republican, and even looking past that I think the House in Washington can simply choose to disqualify Ohio's Electors, and Bush would win in either case. That would be very ugly way to do it though.
30 posted on
11/19/2004 8:46:21 PM PST by
KoRn
To: Clump
Anyone who voted has no case, and anyone who didn't vote has no case...
31 posted on
11/19/2004 9:13:08 PM PST by
ambrose
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson