My belief is that both are partially right but both are incomplete explanations.
Ergo, neither side can "prove" they are right, and it comes down to a simply a matter of competing beliefs.
That is what the polls show. but the writer of the article seemed to conclude that some people were "wrong", and some "right. I leave it to you to determine which side he thought was "right".
My answer is both (paritally), and neither (completely), That "choice" was missing in the poll, which makes it invalid since it artificially forces some answer to make a point.
Notice the large number that "don't have enough information". What conclusions can be drawn from those responses?
The writer apparently didn't think they were significant, or else he attempted to align their answer with one side or another.