Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JesseHousman

I think that this is a local issue that state judges need not to involve themselves in. If your town wants kids under 16 in a midnight, then thats the way it should be.


5 posted on 11/19/2004 8:29:02 AM PST by KC_Conspirator (I am poster #48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All
I think that this is a local issue that state judges need not to involve themselves in. If your town wants kids under 16 in a midnight, then thats the way it should be.

Do you think its constitutional? Not saying it's not - just asking.
6 posted on 11/19/2004 8:30:23 AM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: KC_Conspirator

Amen, KC.


13 posted on 11/19/2004 8:40:11 AM PST by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: KC_Conspirator
When you think about it from a state government employees union perspective, it makes perfect sense for the justices to reach this decision, and thus needing full budgeting and funding of police, emergency service, and other municipal employees needing to babysit the after midnight garbage.

Just job security I suppose. That and if they tire themselves out during the night, they are not likely to have a full tank of mischief during the daytime when the justices and other enlightened public are at risk.

17 posted on 11/19/2004 8:48:05 AM PST by blackdog (Can we possibly have just one more "Kidz-Bop"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson