Posted on 11/19/2004 6:51:08 AM PST by johnny7
Don't worry. The lesbian thing is coming. Anything to smear her.
That's kinda my theory, too. Just because a guy is 38 and unmarried doesn't mean he's gay.
And, honestly, if he is, I don't care. So long as he doesn't shove it down my throat.
They'll call Condi worse in the confimation hearings. Funny how it's OK for libs to out queers when it suits them, otherwise "it's no one elses buiness"
Are you sure Condi isn't married?
Sounds like this guy likes sour grapes.
He's also a "whole pie or no pie" kind of guy.
Me...I'd rather have some pie than no pie at all.
This is just great. This idiot speculates that Mehlman "might" be gay, and then proceeds to criticize him based on that strawman.
Frankly, it's none of anyone's freakin' business what Mehlman does or does not do in the bedroom. What an underhanded creep this "buddy" is.
Trying to smear someone with the gay label..........again.
I thought there was nothing wrong with being gay. Hehe.........we all know that even the Dems don't believe that.
The point being, not that he's gay, but that he's a hypocrite (if he really is gay) for working for a campaign that made use of anti-gay themes. [You might argue that protecting marriage isn't anti-gay, and that this didn't really have anything directly to do with the Bush re-election campaign, but that's not how Democrats see it.]
I notice the first
words of your rambling comment
are: "Maybe I'm out . . ."
I have two co-workers, both in their thirties who have never been married. Neither one, to the best of my knowledge, is gay. Of course, I have the class not to bring it up, unlike some people.
The politics of personal distruction of the left didn't take long to manifest against Mehlman now that he's to be the RNC's top dog. Gossipy stuff like this will be right at home on the democrat sites. They are already accusing the president and Dr. Rice of having an affair. Sad.
America doesn't want 'traditional marriage' demeaned anymore than it already is. The act of sodomy does not constitute the consumating of a marriage... at least to anyone playing with a full deck!
A majority of Americans however, would probably acknowledge civil unions through traditional legal channels.
I agree. Why is it if someone is unmarried they are immediately suspected of being gay. There have been plenty of men and women who have gone through life unmarried that were not homosexual. Henry David Thoreau, Sir Isaac Newton, Beethoven, the apostle Paul and . . . . even Jesus! Don't equate not being married to being homosexual!
Well, some have actually, but Condi has dated. In fact, she was engaged a long time ago.
Yes. Never married. Once engaged.
Do they date? I think that's what this guy is talking about. Regardless, I don't care.
Freudian slip! Freudian slip!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.