To: TaxRelief
Native Americans???? They mention NAs and don't say WHY they're included in this group. Odd.
27 posted on
11/19/2004 7:09:18 AM PST by
cyborg
To: cyborg
"Native Americans???? They mention NAs and don't say WHY they're included in this group. Odd."
I would suspect it's because NA's typically have little body hair (from all the John Wayne movies I've seen). But I still don't get the connection.
This is not a Homosexual disease as the title indicates, although they are probably more susceptible because of their sexual habits.
To: cyborg
This study (which I cannot find on line) is the basis for the Native American risk factor:
Groos A, Naimi T, Wolset D, Smith-Johnson K, Moore K, Cheek J. Emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a rural American Indian community (Abstract 1230), 39th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, 1999.
56 posted on
11/19/2004 8:14:14 AM PST by
TaxRelief
(Alcohol-based hand sanitizer (waterless soap) is great stuff.)
To: cyborg
Native Americans???? They mention NAs and don't say WHY they're included in this group. Odd.They may not know why. Sweat lodge maybe?
62 posted on
11/19/2004 8:29:35 AM PST by
null and void
(Evolution is not about the origin of life on earth. It's about the origin of *species* of life!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson