Skip to comments.
Feinstein Warns Goss Against CIA Reforms
AP ^
| 11/18/04
Posted on 11/18/2004 6:36:45 PM PST by nypokerface
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
To: nypokerface
Feinstein Warns Goss Against CIA Reforms
He's quaking in his boots I'm sure...
2
posted on
11/18/2004 6:38:04 PM PST
by
Citizen James
(Notorious G.O.P.)
To: nypokerface
Hey Feinstein, why don't you get a job as a display in a wax museum.
3
posted on
11/18/2004 6:38:30 PM PST
by
leadpencil1
(GW+4 HA HA HA)
To: nypokerface
For heaven's sake, the purpose of an executive agency is to serve the President's administration, not undermine it as Scheuer and the like have been doing. That's not partisanship, but the nature of the executive. Under Clinton, the CIA should be serving the President as much as under Bush.
To: nypokerface
"Politicization" is the problem now.
Typical democrat hack to twist language into a knot. Classic Orwell
5
posted on
11/18/2004 6:39:09 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(Big government is still a big problem.)
To: Citizen James
I wonder how many intelligence reports have passed from Diane Feinswine to the ChiComs.
6
posted on
11/18/2004 6:39:20 PM PST
by
Frohickey
To: Citizen James
Feinstein Warns Goss ... "politicization of our intelligence services" ahhh - what's SHE doing? That's not political?
7
posted on
11/18/2004 6:39:43 PM PST
by
maine-iac7
( Pray without doubt..."Ask and you SHALL receive")
To: nypokerface
In a letter to Goss, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., also said she feared the "politicization of our intelligence services" because of an e-mail Goss sent this week to agency employees telling them to serve the Bush administration. That is hilarious considering we had DNC thugs in there. And btw Dianne dear, that isn't what Goss said. The spin must make her dizzy.
8
posted on
11/18/2004 6:40:48 PM PST
by
ladyinred
(Congratulations President Bush! Four more years!)
To: nypokerface
Miz Feinstein is trying to keep the CIA from spitting out the left opposition that permeates the agency. It's all part of the reluctance to give up power.
9
posted on
11/18/2004 6:41:01 PM PST
by
ThanhPhero
(Ong la nguoi di hanh huong den La Vang)
To: nypokerface
In the e-mail, Goss said, "We do not identify with, support or champion opposition to the administration or its policies. We provide the intelligence as we see it and let the facts alone speak to the policy-maker." And this e-mail of course upsets a liberal/leftists/communist because it asks/tells the CIA to at least protect your country!
10
posted on
11/18/2004 6:41:19 PM PST
by
rocksblues
(No more Kerry, no more polls!)
To: nypokerface
There she stands, saying "Rebuild that Wall, Director Goss!"
11
posted on
11/18/2004 6:42:21 PM PST
by
SmithL
(What? Me gloat?)
To: Citizen James
Mr. Goss has the choice of counting desert tortises or, perhaps, checking into the Chinese mafia.....Hmmmmm?
12
posted on
11/18/2004 6:43:16 PM PST
by
pointsal
To: All
I would support Mr. Goss' first act as new director to be a sanction on Mizz Fatstein
To: nypokerface
The dimocrats want us to leave all the "moles" that have been leaking stuff to the press the last four years
To: nypokerface
The 911 Atrocities were brought to us by Feinstein and her insane Democrat friends.
If they say something, America better do the opposite.
15
posted on
11/18/2004 6:44:44 PM PST
by
Diogenesis
("Then I say unto you, send men to summon ... worms. And let us go to Fallujah to collect heads.")
To: nypokerface
what does feinstein (or any democrat) know about intelligence or covert activities.
I will admit that the radical left knows a lot about overthrows of free governments, propaganda techniques, and brainwashing.
16
posted on
11/18/2004 6:47:52 PM PST
by
steplock
(http://www.outoftimeradio.org)
To: nypokerface
If anyone ever had any questions about whether or not Goss was doing the right thing and the resignations were people we didn't really want, this should ease their minds.
17
posted on
11/18/2004 6:48:48 PM PST
by
SittinYonder
(Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
To: nypokerface
his efforts to make major changes could have "a significant and negative effect on the agency."On the other hand, his efforts could have a significant and POSITIVE effect on the Agency. Time will tell...
18
posted on
11/18/2004 6:49:23 PM PST
by
lancer
(If you are not with us, you are against us!)
To: nypokerface
If the dims are upset about this, then it's a good thing and was much needed.
To: nypokerface
"She feared the 'politicization of our intelligence services' because of an e-mail Goss sent this week to agency employees telling them to serve the Bush administration."
Would she prefer the CIA to serve some other administration instead? Perhaps they should receive a direct line to FORMER President Clinton or maybe Carter or Ford, and instead serve one of them. This is ludicrous...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson