Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fo0hzy
I agree. But its a grey area... hard to define & regulate. In a perfect world, there would be no need for porn...

Everyone agrees that child pornography shouldn't be tolerated. Even the porn industry supports cracking down on child pornographers and have done somewhat of a good job regulating themselves. I mean, parents (and wives of husbands who view porn) can easily buy NetNanny or any other Internet filter or blocker on the market instead of complaining to Mother Government about it and shredding the 1st Amendment.

Look, porn is like weeds in the yard. You're not going to eradicate it entirely. But you can control it with city ordinances, age checks, politicians using the bully pulpit, etc. Maybe if some chicks would give it up more often to their husbands or boyfriends instead of faking headaches they wouldn't have to look at porn.

67 posted on 11/18/2004 6:52:02 PM PST by 12 Gauge Mossberg (I Approved This Posting - Paid For By Mossberg, Inc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: 12 Gauge Mossberg
Look, porn is like weeds in the yard. You're not going to eradicate it entirely.

Yep, I understand that. I think I said as much. My 'Perfect World' will never be, and neither will yours... or yours... or yours... (points at all Freepers) etc...etc...

However.

We can lead by example. It is all we have, really. For example, I am soooo totally not enjoying this porno I'm watching right now.

/kidding
91 posted on 11/18/2004 7:01:05 PM PST by fo0hzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson